Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Adolescent inpatients with suicidal thoughts show increased risk-taking in decision-making taskDo risky choices in teens predict suicidal thoughts, and what does this mean for prevention?

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider elevated approach parameters and reduced reward sensitivity as potential cognitive markers in adolescents with suicidal thoughts.

This observational study investigated cognitive and affective mechanisms in adolescent suicidal patients. The analysis included 83 adolescent inpatients with affective disorders (58 with suicidal thoughts and behaviors [S+], 25 without [S-]) and 118 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Participants completed a decision-making task involving choices between certain and gamble options, alongside momentary mood ratings. The primary outcome was risk-taking behavior, with secondary outcomes including suicidal symptom severity and gambling.

Results showed that S+ participants exhibited greater risk-taking than both S- participants and healthy controls. Computational modeling indicated this increase was specifically driven by an elevated approach parameter in S+. Mood-model analyses revealed reduced sensitivity to certain rewards in S+ relative to the other groups. Furthermore, these computational signatures predicted suicidal symptom severity and showed generalizability in an independent general-population sample of 747 individuals. Lower mood sensitivity to certain rewards was also associated with greater gambling in S+.

No safety or tolerability data were reported. The study's practice relevance is framed as highlighting potential for early identification and prevention of suicidality. Key limitations were not detailed in the provided evidence. The findings are observational and cannot establish causality, requiring careful interpretation in clinical contexts.

Imagine a teenager facing a tough choice between a safe reward and a risky gamble. A new study found that teens with suicidal thoughts often lean toward the risky option. This wasn't just about being impulsive; their brains reacted differently to safe rewards, feeling less satisfaction from them. The research involved 83 hospitalized teens with mood disorders and 118 healthy controls, plus a larger group of regular people to check if these patterns hold true outside the hospital.

The team used special math models to track these choices. They discovered that the teens with suicidal thoughts had a higher drive to approach rewards, even risky ones, while feeling less joy from certain, safe gains. This specific mix of behaviors predicted how severe their suicidal feelings were. Interestingly, this pattern also linked to higher gambling behavior in those same teens.

While these findings are important for spotting risk early, we must be careful. This was an observational study, meaning it shows connections but does not prove that changing these choices will cure suicidal thoughts. The results are a powerful tool for understanding the mind, but they are not a magic switch for prevention yet.

What this means for you:
Teens with suicidal thoughts show unique risky choices and low reward sensitivity, offering a new way to spot danger early.

Study Details

Sample sizen = 747
EvidenceLevel 5
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STB) are among the leading causes of death worldwide. Although previous research has consistently documented elevated risk-taking in individuals with STB and identified mood disturbances as central features of suicidality, the precise cognitive and affective computational mechanisms underlying this increased risky behavior remain poorly understood. Here, 83 adolescent inpatients with affective disorders, including 58 patients with STB (S+) and 25 without STB (S-), and 118 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HC) completed a decision-making task involving choices between certain and gamble options, alongside momentary mood ratings. Behavioral analyses showed that S+ exhibited greater risk-taking than both S- and HC. Computational modeling of choice behavior using a prospect-theory framework augmented with value-insensitive approach-avoidance parameters indicated that this increase in risky behavior was specifically driven by an elevated approach parameter in S+. In addition, mood-model analyses revealed reduced sensitivity to certain rewards in S+ relative to S- and HC. Importantly, these computational signatures predicted suicidal symptom severity and showed generalizability in an independent general-population sample (n = 747). In S+, lower mood sensitivity to certain rewards was associated with greater gambling, providing a computational affective account of increased risk-taking in STB. These findings remained robust after adjusting for demographic, clinical, and medication-related variables. Overall, our study identifies cognitive and affective computational mechanisms contributing to elevated risk-taking in STB and highlights their potential relevance for the early identification and prevention of suicidality.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.