Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Meta-analysis finds tDCS does not significantly improve core ADHD symptoms in 1,864 patients

Meta-analysis finds tDCS does not significantly improve core ADHD symptoms in 1,864 patients
Photo by Logan Voss / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note: Current evidence does not support tDCS as a standalone treatment for core ADHD symptoms.

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) versus sham stimulation in 1,864 patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The primary outcome was core ADHD symptoms, with secondary outcomes including inhibitory control, working memory, cognitive flexibility, and hot executive functions. The study setting and follow-up duration were not reported.

For core ADHD symptoms, tDCS showed no significant improvement (SMD = -0.29, 95% CI [-0.59, 0.01], p=0.05). Similarly, no significant overall effects were found for inhibitory control (Hedges' g = -0.11, p=0.19), working memory (Hedges' g = 0.13, p=0.26), cognitive flexibility (SMD = -0.42, p=0.24), or hot executive functions (Hedges' g = 0.27, p=0.19). Exploratory analyses indicated that anode placement at Fp2 was associated with improvement in inhibitory control (Hedges' g = -0.52, p=0.01) and working memory (Hedges' g = 0.72, p=0.004).

Safety data showed tDCS was well-tolerated with mild and transient local skin symptoms such as itching and redness (RR = 1.42, p=0.04). Serious adverse events and discontinuation rates were not reported. Key limitations were not specified in the input, and funding or conflicts of interest were not reported.

Based on the current evidence, tDCS is not recommended as a standalone treatment for ADHD. The findings suggest that while specific stimulation parameters might influence certain cognitive domains, overall clinical efficacy for core symptoms remains unproven. Clinicians should interpret the exploratory findings regarding electrode placement cautiously, as these require validation in prospective trials.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
ObjectiveThis meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for treating Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).MethodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, we analyzed 28 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 1,864 participants. Outcomes encompassed core ADHD symptoms, hot and cold executive functions (EFs)—including inhibitory control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility—as well as safety profiles based on adverse events. A multilevel meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were conducted to explore potential moderating factors.ResultsCompared to sham stimulation, tDCS did not significantly improve core ADHD symptoms (standardized mean difference (SMD) = –0.29, 95% CI [–0.59, 0.01], p= 0.05). Similarly, no significant overall effects were observed for cold EFs: inhibitory control (Hedges’ g(g)= –0.11, 95% CI [–0.26, 0.05], p=0.19), working memory (g= 0.13, 95% CI [–0.06, 0.32], p= 0.26), or cognitive flexibility (SMD = –0.42, 95% CI [–1.13, 0.29], p= 0.24). The effect on hot EFs was also non-significant (g = 0.27, 95% CI [–0.14, 0.70], p = 0.19). Exploratory analyses indicated that anode placement at Fp2 was associated with improvement in both inhibitory control (g= –0.52, 95% CI [–0.93, –0.11], p=0.01) and working memory (g = 0.72, 95% CI [0.22, 1.22], p = 0.004), although the overall test for interaction was not significant for inhibitory control (p= 0.19). The most common adverse reactions were mild and transient local skin symptoms, such as itching and redness (RR = 1.42, p=0.04).ConclusiontDCS was well-tolerated but did not demonstrate significant overall efficacy for core ADHD symptoms or executive functions. Anodal stimulation at Fp2 showed potential selective benefits warranting further investigation. tDCS is not currently recommended as a standalone treatment for ADHD. Future research should optimize stimulation protocols and explore combined interventions with behavioral or cognitive therapies.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42024612055.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.