Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Reproductive coercion is associated with reduced contraceptive self-efficacy and adverse mental health outcomesUnderstanding the Impact of Reproductive Coercion on Women's Mental Health

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Recognize that reproductive coercion is linked to lower contraceptive self-efficacy and adverse mental health outcomes.

This scoping review synthesized 119 studies to map the landscape of reproductive coercion, which includes pregnancy coercion, birth control sabotage, and abortion coercion. The review highlights a wide range of reported prevalence rates, spanning from 1% to 58% across various settings. The authors identify specific risk factors, including unstable or non-marital partnerships, partner concurrency, co-residence with in-laws, and lower household wealth, while noting that partner education and employment may serve as protective factors.

Key findings indicate that reproductive coercion is independently associated with reduced contraceptive self-efficacy and use, increased covert contraception, unintended pregnancy, sexually transmitted infections, and adverse mental health. These findings suggest that reproductive coercion significantly impacts reproductive autonomy and psychological well-being.

Several limitations are noted, including a lack of consensus on conceptualizations and a scarcity of act-based items for abortion coercion. Additionally, the authors note implementation barriers for interventions, such as training, time, and referral pathways. The review suggests that advancing the field requires harmonized, intent-sensitive, act-based definitions and more diverse research in low- and middle-income countries to improve coordinated legal, health, and community responses.

How this fits prior evidence

This scoping review addresses a gap in the literature regarding the specific impacts of reproductive coercion on mental health. While prior coverage has explored various mental health interventions, including psychedelics and digital tools, this review specifically focuses on the consequences of reproductive coercion on mental health, contraceptive use, and reproductive autonomy.

Reproductive coercion happens when a partner pressures or forces a woman to make specific choices about pregnancy and birth control. This can include sabotaging birth control, forcing a pregnancy, or pressuring someone to have an abortion. Research shows that many women face these pressures in various settings around the world.

Studies show that these situations often lead to serious personal consequences. Women who experience reproductive coercion are more likely to have unintended pregnancies and higher rates of infections. They also report feeling less confident in their ability to use birth control and often suffer from significant mental health struggles.

Certain factors can increase the risk of these issues, such as unstable relationships or living in certain household structures. On the other hand, having a partner with more education or stable employment can sometimes act as a protective factor.

Experts suggest that better definitions and more community support are needed to help women. By improving education and providing clear legal and health resources, communities can better protect women from these harmful behaviors and improve their overall well-being.

What this means for you:
Reproductive coercion harms women's mental health and leads to higher rates of unintended pregnancies.

Common questions

What is reproductive coercion?

Reproductive coercion includes actions like pregnancy coercion, birth control sabotage, and abortion coercion. It involves a partner pressuring or forcing a woman to make specific choices about her reproductive health. Research shows these actions can lead to unintended pregnancies and serious mental health issues for the women involved.

What factors increase the risk of reproductive coercion?

The risk of reproductive coercion is higher in unstable or non-marital partnerships, when partners are seeing other people, or when living with in-laws. Lower household wealth also increases risk. Conversely, a partner's education and employment were found to be protective factors against these situations.

What are the consequences of reproductive coercion?

Women who experience reproductive coercion may face several risks. These include lower confidence in using birth control, higher rates of covert contraception, increased risk of sexually transmitted infections, and a higher likelihood of unintended pregnancies and poor mental health.

Study Details

Study typeGuideline
EvidenceLevel 5
PublishedOct 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Reproductive coercion—behaviors that interfere with women's autonomous reproductive decision-making—is increasingly recognized but remains unevenly defined and measured across settings. We conducted a scoping review and searched MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, for English-language studies from 1995 to April 2023. Of 8,515 records identified, 119 studies met inclusion criteria; 56% were quantitative, 55% were published during 2020–2023, and most were conducted in high-income settings (58% United States; 13% Australia). Conceptualizations evolved from a narrow focus on pregnancy coercion and birth control sabotage toward inclusion of abortion coercion, provider-level dynamics, and experiences during motherhood, though consensus is lacking. Measurement was dominated by the Miller reproductive control scale and adaptations; act-based items for abortion coercion were scarce. Reported prevalence spanned ∼1%–58% depending on timeframe, setting, and measure. Multi-level risk factors included unstable or non-marital partnerships, partner concurrency, co-residence with in-laws, and lower household wealth; partner education and employment were protective in several contexts. Reproductive coercion frequently co-occurred with intimate partner, sexual, and domestic violence yet showed independent associations with reduced contraceptive self-efficacy and use, increased covert contraception, unintended pregnancy, sexually transmitted infection, and adverse mental health. Evidence on interventions centers on clinic-based, trauma-informed education and counselling, with implementation barriers related to training, time, and referral pathways. Advancing the field requires a harmonized, intent-sensitive, act-based definition and improved measures, especially for abortion coercion, together with more diverse research in low- and middle-income countries and coordinated legal, health, educational, and community responses to protect women's reproductive autonomy.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.