This mini-review synthesizes evidence on integrative psychological interventions for stress regulation in competitive athletes. The review covers cognitive-behavioral approaches, mindfulness- and acceptance-based interventions, and psychophysiological and technology-assisted strategies. The authors note that the evidence generally supports effectiveness in improving emotional regulation, attentional control, and stress management, but no single intervention can be considered universally optimal.
Cognitive-behavioral strategies appear most effective for structured pre-competition preparation, while mindfulness-based approaches are suited for in-performance regulation. Psychophysiological and technology-assisted strategies are highlighted for monitoring and recovery processes. Technology-assisted tools may enhance self-awareness and feedback, but excessive reliance on external monitoring may limit the development of autonomous self-regulation skills, particularly among younger athletes.
The authors acknowledge that the evidence remains heterogeneous and often context-dependent. Effectiveness varies according to athlete characteristics and sport-specific demands. The review does not report pooled effect sizes, sample sizes, or follow-up durations, and no safety data are provided.
Practice relevance: Stress regulation is best conceptualized as a trainable, context-sensitive skill that requires individualized and integrative intervention approaches. Clinicians working with athletes should consider tailoring interventions to the individual and the specific demands of the sport, while being cautious about over-reliance on technology-assisted tools.
View Original Abstract ↓
Psychological stress plays a critical role in shaping performance and well-being in competitive sport. This mini-review examines three major categories of psychological interventions for stress regulation in athletes: cognitive-behavioral approaches, mindfulness- and acceptance-based interventions, and psychophysiological and technology-assisted strategies. While existing literature generally supports the effectiveness of these approaches in improving emotional regulation, attentional control, and stress management, the evidence remains heterogeneous and often context-dependent. Importantly, current findings suggest that no single intervention can be considered universally optimal, as effectiveness appears to vary according to athlete characteristics and sport-specific demands. This review provides a critical and comparative synthesis of the literature, highlighting differential roles of intervention approaches across performance contexts. Cognitive-behavioral strategies appear most effective for structured pre-competition preparation, mindfulness-based approaches for in-performance regulation, and psychophysiological and technology-assisted strategies for monitoring and recovery processes. In addition, the increasing integration of technology in sport presents both opportunities and challenges. While technology-assisted tools may enhance self-awareness and feedback, excessive reliance on external monitoring may limit the development of autonomous self-regulation skills, particularly among younger athletes. Overall, stress regulation is best conceptualized as a trainable, context-sensitive skill that requires individualized and integrative intervention approaches. Future research should focus on comparative and longitudinal designs to better understand the interaction between intervention type, athlete profile, and performance context.