Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Lung cancer trial patients show disparities in optional biospecimen study participation

Lung cancer trial patients show disparities in optional biospecimen study participation
Photo by National Cancer Institute / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note disparities in optional biospecimen study participation among lung cancer trial patients.

This observational analysis examined patient and institutional characteristics associated with agreement to participate in optional, embedded biospecimen studies. The study included 3017 patients enrolled in the ECOG-ACRIN phase 3 E1505 and E5508 lung cancer therapeutic trials (mean age 63 years, 49% female, 83% non-Hispanic white). The analysis used multivariable logistic regression to assess factors influencing participation decisions.

Overall, 2692 of 3017 patients (89%) agreed to participate in at least one biospecimen study, with non-Hispanic white patients showing higher participation rates (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.45-0.79, P < 0.001). For studies requiring future biospecimen collection, 2577 of 3017 patients (85%) agreed, with similar disparities observed (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.48-0.80, P < 0.001). Women, racial and ethnic minorities, and patients treated outside major academic centers were consistently less likely to participate.

Safety and tolerability data for biospecimen collection were not reported. The analysis has several limitations: it represents an observational analysis of trial data rather than a randomized study, and findings may not generalize beyond the specific lung cancer trial populations studied. The associations reported should not be interpreted as causal relationships.

For clinical practice, this analysis highlights potential disparities in research participation that could affect the representativeness of biospecimen collections. Clinicians involved in trial recruitment should be aware that certain patient groups may be less likely to participate in optional research components. Addressing these disparities could improve the equity and generalizability of translational research findings.

Study Details

Study typePhase3
Sample sizen = 3,017
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Biospecimen analyses may provide important insights into patient selection and pharmacodynamic effects. To provide generalizable findings, such studies must enroll adequate and diverse populations. METHODS: We analyzed patient and institutional characteristics according to agreement to participate in optional, embedded biospecimen studies among patients enrolled in the E1505 and E5508 phase 3 lung cancer therapeutic trials. Differences were compared using Wilcoxon rank sum test, Pearson's Chi-squared test, and logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall, 3,017 patients were enrolled in the two trials. Mean age was 63 years, 49% were female, and 83% were non-Hispanic white. Among these individuals, 2,692 (89%) agreed to participate in at least one biospecimen study, and 2,577 (85%) agreed to studies requiring future biospecimen collection. In multivariable logistic regression, compared to non-Hispanic white patients, other patients were less likely to agree to participate: OR 0.59 (95% CI, 0.45-0.79; P < 0.001) for any biospecimen study; OR 0.62 (95% CI, 0.48-0.80; P < 0.001) for studies requiring future biospecimen collection. Women and patients treated outside main academic institutions (e.g., affiliates, community sites) were also less likely to participate. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients enrolled in lung cancer clinical trials, women, racial and ethnic minorities, and patients treated outside major academic centers are less likely to participate in optional biospecimen studies. Because some of these populations may already be under-represented in trial populations, this pattern may exacerbate disparities in translational and clinical research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00324805, NCT01107626.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.