Review of CFTR modulator impact on cystic fibrosis outcomes from registry data

Aim Cystic fibrosis (CF) care has been transformed by CFTR modulator therapies, yet most efficacy data arise from clinical trials with restrictive eligibility criteria. Real world registry data can capture treatment outcomes in broader, more diverse patient populations. We used the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR) data to evaluate longitudinal clinical outcomes, and care benchmarking at a single Adult CF Program Center over a decade. Methods A retrospective, descriptive analysis of CFFPR data (2011-2022) was performed to assess trends in modulator use, lung function (ppFEV1), body mass index (BMI), respiratory microbiology, and pulmonary exacerbations (PEx). Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) methods were applied to compare outcomes across peak modulator eras: pre-modulator (2011), ivacaftor (2015), mixed-modulator (2019), and elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELE/TEZ/IVA) (2021). Program-level outcomes were benchmarked against national network metrics to assess adherence to guideline-based care. Results Over ten years, median ppFEV1 improved from 63.4% (2011) to 78.8% (2021), and BMI increased from 22.3 to 24.8 kg/m2. The proportion of adults experiencing more than one PEx annually declined from 39.7% to 19.5%, while Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P.a.) culture positivity decreased from 79% to 47%. ELE/TEZ/IVA therapy was associated with greatest clinical improvements. Program-level performance remained comparable to national network benchmarks, reflecting high adherence to standard care metrics. Conclusion Registry-based CER provides valuable real-world insights into CF care effectiveness and quality improvement. This decade-long analysis demonstrates significant clinical gains associated with modulator therapies and highlights the importance of patient registries in monitoring outcomes, benchmarking care, and informing global CF care models and standards for rare disease management.