Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Meta-analysis finds 7% incidence of suspected carotid atheromas on dental panoramic radiographsDental X-rays May Show Calcified Artery Plaque in Some Patients

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider incidental carotid atheroma findings on dental radiographs as potential vascular risk indicators, not screening.

This publication is a systematic review and meta-analysis that synthesizes evidence from 34 cross-sectional studies conducted in dental practice settings. Its scope focuses on the incidence of suspected calcified carotid artery atheromas detected incidentally on panoramic radiographs taken for dental purposes in patients, without evaluating interventions or comparators. The authors pooled data to provide a quantitative summary of this observational finding.

The key finding from the meta-analysis is an incidence of approximately 7% (95% CI 5-9%) for suspected calcified carotid artery atheromas identified on panoramic radiographs. This pooled estimate is derived from cross-sectional studies, indicating an association rather than causal evidence. The authors note substantial heterogeneity among the included studies, which may affect the reliability and generalizability of the result.

Limitations highlighted include the observational nature of the data, with no follow-up or safety outcomes reported, and the heterogeneity among studies. The authors emphasize that panoramic radiography is not a screening modality for carotid artery disease, reinforcing cautious interpretation. In terms of practice relevance, they suggest dentists should recognize potential calcified carotid atheromas when interpreting images and consider referral for medical evaluation, but this is based on associative evidence without established clinical outcomes.

Researchers combined data from 34 different cross-sectional studies to look at dental patients undergoing panoramic imaging. The goal was to see how often these dental X-rays accidentally showed calcified plaque in the carotid arteries, which are blood vessels in the neck that supply blood to the brain.

The analysis found that approximately 7% of the dental images showed suspected calcified carotid artery atheromas. The range across studies was between 5% and 9%. This means that in a group of patients getting routine dental X-rays, a small number might have visible signs of arterial plaque simply because the X-ray captured it, not because the test was meant to find it.

There were no reported safety concerns or adverse events because the X-rays themselves are standard dental procedures. The main reason to be careful is that seeing plaque on a dental image does not confirm a diagnosis. Dentists should recognize these potential findings when interpreting images. If suspicious calcifications are seen, appropriate referral for medical evaluation may support early assessment of patients with possible vascular risk factors. Readers should understand that panoramic radiography is not a screening modality for carotid artery disease.

What this means for you:
About 7% of dental panoramic X-rays show calcified plaque, but these images are not for screening heart disease.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
OBJECTIVE: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a granulomatous vasculitis affecting medium- and large-sized arteries, most commonly the temporal arteries. Delayed recognition can lead to severe complications, including irreversible vision loss and stroke. Dentists routinely obtain panoramic radiographs for dental assessment, where calcified carotid artery atheromas (CCAA) may appear as incidental findings in the cervical region. This study systematically evaluated the incidence of suspected CCAA detected on panoramic radiographs obtained for dental indications and considered the clinical relevance of these findings for dental practitioners. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase databases was conducted to identify studies reporting calcified carotid artery atheromas detected on panoramic radiographs. Study selection followed PRISMA guidelines. Observational studies reporting CCAA on panoramic radiographs were included. Data extraction was performed independently, and pooled incidence estimates were calculated using a random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-four cross-sectional studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled incidence of suspected CCAA detected on panoramic radiographs was approximately 7% (95% CI 5-9%). Substantial heterogeneity was observed among studies. These findings indicate that incidental radiographic detection of cervical calcifications occurs in a measurable proportion of dental patients undergoing panoramic imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Although panoramic radiography is not a screening modality for carotid artery disease, dentists should recognize potential calcified carotid atheromas when interpreting images obtained for dental purposes. Identification of suspicious calcifications and appropriate referral for medical evaluation may support early assessment of patients with possible vascular risk factors. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Routine dental examinations and panoramic radiography may allow early risk identification, underscoring the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.