Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

TACE plus donafenib and camrelizumab shows improved outcomes in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

TACE plus donafenib and camrelizumab shows improved outcomes in unresectable hepatocellular carcinom…
Photo by Nathan Rimoux / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider the association of TACE plus donafenib and camrelizumab with improved survival in uHCC, but note the single-center retrospective design limits certainty.

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of 116 patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), propensity score matched to 58 per group. The intervention was transarterial chemoembolization plus donafenib plus camrelizumab (TACE+D+C), compared to transarterial chemoembolization plus donafenib (TACE+D).

The TACE+D+C group had a significantly higher objective response rate (62.07% vs 36.21%, P = 0.005) and disease control rate (86.21% vs 70.69%, P = 0.042). Median overall survival was longer in the combination group (23.1 months vs 12.0 months, P = 0.022), as was median progression-free survival (13.0 months vs 7.8 months, P = 0.007).

Safety data were limited; the report noted a comparable safety profile between groups, but specific adverse event rates were not reported. Key limitations include the single-center retrospective design, which limits generalizability, and the lack of reported primary outcome and follow-up duration.

The association between the combination therapy and improved outcomes is reported, but causation is not established. Practice relevance is constrained by the observational design, and prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
To compare the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization plus donafenib (TACE+D) and TACE plus donafenib combined with camrelizumab (TACE+D+C) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), using propensity score matching (PSM) to minimize selection bias. A single-center retrospective study analyzed 278 patients with uHCC who received treatment between 2021 and 2024, and they were divided into TACE+D and TACE+D+C groups. PSM was used to perform 1:1 matching (58 patients per group). Tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were compared; Cox regression was used to identify prognostic factors. After PSM, 58 patients were included in each group. Compared with the TACE+D group, the TACE+D+C group demonstrated a significantly higher partial response (PR) (37.93% vs 20.69%, P = 0.041), objective response rate (ORR) (62.07% vs 36.21%, P = 0.005) and disease control rate (DCR) (86.21% vs 70.69%, P = 0.042). Notably, the TACE+D+C group achieved a remarkably longer mOS than the TACE+D group (23.1 months vs 12.0 months, P = 0.022). Similarly, median PFS was significantly prolonged in the TACE+D+C group compared with the TACE+D group (13.0 months vs 7.8 months, P = 0.007). Multivariable Cox regression identified Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.69, P = 0.029), Protein Induced by Vitamin K Absence or Antagonist-II (PIVKA-II) (HR = 3.66, P  The TACE+D+C group significantly improves ORR, PFS and OS in uHCC patients with a comparable safety profile to the TACE+D group, while the single-center retrospective design limits generalizability, warranting prospective studies.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.