Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Ultrasound-guided microconvex in-plane subclavian puncture reduces composite risk and improves success rates compared to landmark techniqueUltrasound-guided puncture lowers risks for subclavian vein catheterization

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider ultrasound-guided microconvex in-plane subclavian puncture for reduced risk and higher success in elective surgery patients.

This randomized controlled trial evaluated 101 patients scheduled for elective surgery. Participants were assigned to either an ultrasound-guided microconvex in-plane subclavian puncture (MISP) technique or a landmark technique performed after an ultrasound prescan. The primary outcome was a composite risk score encompassing puncture attempts, required time, posterior venous wall injury, arterial punctures, hematoma formation, hemo- or pneumothorax, and catheter mispositioning. Secondary outcomes included success rates, complication rates, and procedural times.

results showed that the composite risk score was significantly lower in the MISP group with a mean difference of 5.21. Absolute numbers were 6.4 ± 5.9 for MISP versus 11.6 ± 10.8 for the comparator, with a 95% CI of 1.71-8.71 and a P value of .028. Overall success rates were significantly higher in the MISP group at 86% versus 71% for the comparator. The 95% CI for success rates was 74.6%-93.9% versus 56.2%-82.5%, with a P value of .046.

Arterial punctures were significantly reduced in the MISP group, with absolute numbers of 1.9% versus 12% for the comparator. The 95% CI for this outcome was 0.05%-10.45% versus 4.5%-24.3%, and the P value was .047. One case of pneumothorax was noted in both groups, representing an incidence of 2% each. Procedural time was mean 5 minutes longer in the MISP group, with a P value less than .001.

Safety data included posterior venous wall injury, arterial punctures, hematoma formation, hemo- or pneumothorax, and catheter mispositioning. One pneumothorax was noted in both groups. Discontinuations and tolerability were not reported. Funding or conflicts of interest were not reported. Further studies should evaluate the implementation of the MISP technique as a standard approach for subclavian vein catheterization.

This randomized controlled trial compared two methods for placing catheters into subclavian veins before elective surgery. One hundred one patients were scheduled for this procedure. Researchers tested an ultrasound-guided microconvex in-plane subclavian puncture against a standard landmark technique that used an ultrasound prescan.

The study found that the ultrasound-guided method significantly lowered a composite risk score. This score included measures like puncture attempts, time required, and risks of injury to the vein wall or artery. Success rates were also significantly higher with the ultrasound-guided approach. Specifically, 86 percent of procedures succeeded compared to 71 percent with the landmark technique.

Safety results showed a lower risk of arterial punctures with the new method. However, the ultrasound-guided procedure took about five minutes longer on average. One case of pneumothorax occurred in each group, and one case of posterior venous wall injury was noted. The authors suggest further studies are needed to evaluate using this technique as a standard approach.

What this means for you:
Ultrasound guidance improved success and safety but took longer than the landmark technique for subclavian vein catheterization.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 101
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Central venous catheterization (CVC) of the subclavian vein is a standard procedure in medicine. Ultrasound guidance is increasingly recommended to improve the success rates and reduce complications. This study compared the success rates and complications of ultrasound-guided microconvex in-plane subclavian puncture (MISP) with those of the landmark technique. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 101 patients scheduled for elective surgery were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the group MISP or the control group using the landmark technique after ultrasound prescan. The primary end point was an a priori defined composite risk score including puncture attempts, required time, posterior venous wall injury, arterial punctures, hematoma formation, hemo-, pneumothorax, and catheter mispositioning. The secondary and exploratory end points included success rates, complication rates, and procedural times. Comparisons between groups were performed using Student t test, χ2 test, and Mann-Whitney U test with a significance level of 0.05. Data are mean ± standard deviation [SD], frequencies (%) or 95% confidence interval [CI] [lower limit-upper limit]). RESULTS: The mean ± SD composite risk score was significantly lower in the MISP group compared to control (6.4 ± 5.9 vs 11.6 ± 10.8; mean diff 5.21 [95% CI, 1.71-8.71], P = .028). The MISP technique demonstrated significantly higher as-treated overall success rates (86% [95% CI, 74.6%-93.9%] vs 71% [95% CI, 56.2%-82.5%], P = .046) and significantly reduced the risk of arterial punctures (1.9% [95% CI, 0.05%-10.45%] vs 12% [4.5%-24.3%], number needed to harm: 10 punctures, P = .047). One pneumothorax was noted in both groups (2% each). The mean procedural time was 5 minutes longer in the MISP group (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the landmark technique, the ultrasound-guided MISP technique significantly reduced the risk of complications. The extended procedural time may be justified by lower complication rates. Further studies should evaluate the implementation of the MISP technique as a standard approach for subclavian vein catheterization.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.