Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

ML tool modestly improves dispatcher identification of high-risk patients in ambulance resource constraints

ML tool modestly improves dispatcher identification of high-risk patients in ambulance resource cons…
Photo by Dmytro Vynohradov / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Interpret preliminary RCT data on an ML dispatch tool with caution due to underpowering and limited generalizability.

This randomized controlled trial evaluated whether providing dispatch nurses with a machine learning (ML)-based risk assessment tool could improve their ability to identify the highest-risk patient during ambulance resource-constrained situations (RCS). The study included 1,245 RCS involving adult patients who had been assessed as requiring a low-priority ambulance response at two sites in Sweden. In the intervention arm, dispatchers were provided with an ML-based risk score; the control arm used standard clinical practice. The primary outcome was whether the first available ambulance was correctly sent to the patient with the highest National Early Warning Score (NEWS 2) based on subsequently collected vital signs.

The main result showed that in the intervention arm, 68.3% of RCS were assessed correctly, compared to 62.5% in the control group. This corresponded to an odds ratio of 1.28 (95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.63, p = 0.047). The effect was modest, and the confidence interval includes the null value of 1.00. Safety and tolerability data were not reported.

Key limitations significantly constrain the interpretation of these results. The study was conducted only on patients pre-assessed as low-priority in two Swedish regions, limiting generalizability. Furthermore, the trial was underpowered for its primary outcome due to a smaller-than-expected sample size. The practice relevance for other emergency medical systems is unclear. While the findings suggest a potential signal for ML assistance in dispatch triage, the weak statistical significance and study limitations mean this should be viewed as preliminary evidence requiring confirmation in larger, more diverse settings.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 1
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedMar 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Resource Constrained Situations (RCS) at Emergency Medical Dispatch centers where there are more patients requiring an ambulance than there are available ambulances are common. Machine Learning (ML) techniques offer a promising but largely untested approach to assessing relative risks among these patients. The study aims to establish whether the provision of ML-based risk scores predicting patient outcomes improves the ability of dispatchers to identify patients at high risk for deterioration in RCS and dispatch the first available ambulance to them. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We performed a parallel-group, randomized trial of adult patients assessed by a dispatch nurse at two study sites in Sweden as requiring a low-priority ambulance response in RCS. Patients were randomized 1:1 to be prioritized with the aid of an ML-based risk assessment tool, or per current clinical practice. The primary outcome was defined in terms of whether the first available ambulance was sent to the patient with the highest National Early Warning Score (NEWS 2) based on subsequently collected vital signs. A total of 1,245 RCS were included in the study. In the intervention arm, 68.3% of RCS were assessed correctly per the primary outcome versus 62.5% in the control group, corresponding to an odds ratio of 1.28 (95% CI [1.00, 1.63], p = 0.047). This study was limited to only patients determined to require a low-priority ambulance response in two Swedish regions, and was underpowered for the primary outcome due to a smaller than expected sample size. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that clinical ML-based decision support tools may have the ability to influence care provider decisions and improve their capacity to rapidly differentiate between high- and low-risk patients at dispatch. Further research should establish the suitability of these tools in larger cohorts, for patients with both higher- and lower-levels of priority, and in other settings. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04757194).
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.