A randomized controlled trial followed 145 asymptomatic patients with very severe aortic stenosis (aortic-valve area ≤0.75 cm² with peak aortic jet velocity ≥4.5 m/s) for 10 years. Patients were assigned to either early surgery or conservative care, with the primary outcome being a composite of operative mortality or death from cardiovascular causes during follow-up.
Early surgery resulted in significantly lower rates of the primary composite outcome, occurring in 2 of 73 patients (3%) compared to 17 of 72 patients (24%) in the conservative-care group (hazard ratio 0.10; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.43; P=0.002). The cumulative incidence at 10 years was 1% versus 19%. All-cause mortality was also lower with early surgery (15% vs. 32%; HR 0.42; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.86).
Safety and tolerability data were not reported. The study was funded by the Korean Institute of Medicine. Limitations were not explicitly detailed in the provided information, though the absence of safety reporting and specific surgical details should be noted.
For practice, these results from an intention-to-treat RCT analysis suggest early surgery may provide substantial long-term mortality reduction in this specific, high-risk asymptomatic population. However, clinicians should interpret these findings cautiously given the lack of reported safety outcomes and the need to consider individual patient factors and surgical risk.
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Among asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis, a previous analysis showed that the risk of a composite of death during surgery or within 30 days after surgery (called operative mortality) or death from cardiovascular causes was significantly lower with early surgery than with conservative care. However, the long-term survival benefit of early surgery, as compared with conservative care, remains unclear.
METHODS: We randomly assigned asymptomatic patients with very severe aortic stenosis (defined as an aortic-valve area of ≤0.75 cm with a peak aortic jet velocity of ≥4.5 m per second) in a 1:1 ratio to undergo early surgery or receive conservative care. The primary end point was a composite of operative mortality or death from cardiovascular causes during the 10-year follow-up period.
RESULTS: A total of 145 patients underwent randomization. In an intention-to-treat analysis, a primary end-point event occurred in 2 of 73 patients (3%) in the early-surgery group and in 17 of 72 (24%) in the conservative-care group (hazard ratio, 0.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02 to 0.43; P = 0.002). At 10 years, the cumulative incidence of operative mortality or death from cardiovascular causes was 1% in the early-surgery group and 19% in the conservative-care group. Death from any cause occurred in 11 patients (15%) in the early-surgery group and in 23 (32%) in the conservative-care group (hazard ratio, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.86).
CONCLUSIONS: Among asymptomatic patients with very severe aortic stenosis, early surgery led to a lower risk of a composite of operative mortality or death from cardiovascular causes than conservative care at 10 years. (Funded by the Korean Institute of Medicine; RECOVERY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01161732.).