This narrative review looked at how different teaching methods affect medical students. It compared new approaches like artificial intelligence, simulation, virtual classrooms, and gamification against traditional lectures and textbooks. The study did not report specific numbers on learning scores but looked at several important areas. These included active engagement, how well students understood concepts, and their ability to connect physiology to clinical practice. The review also noted whether these methods helped create a more inclusive learning environment.
The authors found that these modern strategies generally supported better learning outcomes. They also highlighted that these tools can help students prepare for complex clinical work and lifelong learning. However, the review pointed out several challenges that schools face when trying to use these technologies. Issues included a lack of proper infrastructure, gaps in faculty training, and resistance from some institutions.
Readers should understand that this is a review of existing reports rather than a single large trial. The evidence is limited by these practical barriers and ethical questions about using advanced technology. While the findings are promising, they do not prove that digital tools work for every school. The main takeaway is that these methods offer potential benefits but require careful planning to succeed.
