Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

2023 ACR/EULAR APS criteria show 0.99 specificity but lower sensitivity in obstetric phenotypesNew 2023 Criteria Show High Specificity for Antiphospholipid Syndrome

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria provide high specificity (0.99) but have limited sensitivity in obstetric APS.

This meta-analysis evaluates the performance of the 2023 ACR/EULAR antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) classification criteria compared to expert clinical diagnosis and the 2006 revised Sapporo (Sydney) criteria. The analysis included 24 studies comprising 25 data sets to assess sensitivity and specificity across various clinical presentations.

The pooled results demonstrate a high specificity of 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-1.00) for the 2023 criteria. However, sensitivity was more variable, with a pooled sensitivity of 0.74 (95% CI 0.67-0.81). Specifically, sensitivity was notably lower in obstetric APS phenotypes, reported at 0.20 for restricted data and 0.31 for included subgroup data. Sensitivity in thrombotic APS was reported at 0.82.

Authors note that the 2023 criteria are intended for classification rather than clinical diagnosis. Limitations include the lower sensitivity in obstetric phenotypes and the fact that non-classification was driven by isolated IgM antiphospholipid antibody positivity and obstetric APS phenotypes. Clinicians should recognize that while the 2023 criteria offer high specificity, their utility is phenotype-dependent.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis confirms and extends the finding that the 2023 APS criteria show higher specificity but lower sensitivity. Specifically, it quantifies the high specificity at 0.99 and highlights the lower sensitivity in obstetric phenotypes (0.20 to 0.31) compared to thrombotic APS (0.82).

Researchers analyzed 24 studies to evaluate the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). This analysis compared the new criteria against expert clinical diagnoses and older standards. The results showed that the 2023 criteria have a very high specificity of 0.99, meaning they are highly accurate at identifying who has the condition when the test is positive.

However, the sensitivity of these criteria depends on the specific symptoms a patient shows. While the criteria showed a sensitivity of 0.82 for patients with thrombotic APS, the sensitivity was much lower for patients with obstetric APS, ranging between 0.20 and 0.31. This means the test might miss some cases in certain groups.

Because the results vary based on the patient's specific symptoms, these criteria are intended for classification rather than as a primary tool for clinical diagnosis. Patients with obstetric symptoms may not be identified as easily by these specific criteria. You should talk to your doctor to understand how these findings apply to your specific medical situation.

What this means for you:
The 2023 criteria are highly specific for antiphospholipid syndrome but have lower sensitivity for obstetric cases.

Common questions

How accurate are the 2023 criteria for identifying antiphospholipid syndrome?

The 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria show a very high specificity of 0.99. This means the criteria are very reliable at correctly identifying patients who have the condition. However, because the sensitivity varies depending on whether a patient has thrombotic or obstetric symptoms, these criteria are primarily used for classification rather than as a standalone tool for clinical diagnosis.

Are these criteria effective for patients with obstetric symptoms?

The study found that sensitivity is much lower for obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome. When looking at specific data, sensitivity for these cases was between 0.20 and 0.31. Because of this lower sensitivity in specific groups, the 2023 criteria may not catch all cases for patients presenting with obstetric symptoms.

How do these results compare to cases involving blood clots?

The 2023 criteria showed a higher sensitivity of 0.82 for patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome. While this is higher than the results for obstetric cases, the study notes that the criteria are intended for classification. You should consult your doctor to discuss how these specific results relate to your personal health.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
OBJECTIVES: To systematically evaluate the classification performance of the 2023 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature from August 2023 through May 2026, including studies that evaluated the ability of the 2023 ACR/EULAR APS criteria to classify patients previously classified according to expert clinical diagnosis and/or the 2006 revised Sapporo (Sydney) criteria. Data on true and false positives and negatives were extracted. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled using a bivariate random-effects model when both parameters were available; sensitivity was additionally pooled using a univariate random-effects model. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies comprising 25 data sets were included, of which 13 incorporated non-APS control groups. In the bivariate meta-analysis, pooled sensitivity was 0.74 (95% CI 0.67-0.81) and pooled specificity was 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-1.00). Sensitivity demonstrated substantial heterogeneity across studies and varied markedly by APS phenotype. Sensitivity was low in obstetric APS (pooled sensitivity 0.20 in studies restricted to obstetric APS and 0.31 when obstetric subgroup data from additional studies were included), whereas it was higher among cases of thrombotic APS (0.82). Across cohorts, non-classification was mainly driven by isolated IgM antiphospholipid antibody positivity and obstetric APS phenotypes. CONCLUSION: The 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria exhibit consistently excellent specificity but reduced and phenotype-dependent sensitivity. These findings reinforce the intended role of the criteria for classification rather than clinical diagnosis and highlight important limitations in specific APS subgroups.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.