Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Booster CPR training improves some skill retention in novice nurses at 6 months

Booster CPR training improves some skill retention in novice nurses at 6 months
Photo by Frederick Shaw / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider booster CPR sessions for nurses to maintain compression depth, but knowledge effects are unclear.

This quasi-experimental study evaluated 148 novice nurses, comparing a single baseline CPR training session (Single-DP group) to baseline training plus a 3-month booster session (Repeated-DP group). The primary outcome was the 6-month retention of CPR quality and knowledge. Immediately after the initial training, the Single-DP group achieved higher scores in theoretical knowledge (P = 0.001) and overall skill (P = 0.011). However, at the 6-month follow-up, the Repeated-DP group demonstrated superior retention of median compression depth (52.00 vs. 47.50 mm, P = 0.014) and overall skill scores (57.72 vs. 54.55, P < 0.001). Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis found no significant group-by-time interaction for knowledge (P = 0.344) or overall skill (P = 0.400) over the full period. Prior real-world CPR experience was a significant predictor of skill retention (P = 0.004). Safety and tolerability data were not reported. A key limitation is the use of GEE analysis, the specifics of which were not detailed, potentially affecting the interpretation of longitudinal effects. The study setting was also not reported. For practice, this evidence suggests that for novice nurses, a booster training session 3 months after initial CPR instruction may help preserve specific, measurable psychomotor components like compression depth over a 6-month horizon, though it did not show a clear differential effect on knowledge retention. The influence of prior real-world experience highlights that training outcomes are multifactorial.

Study Details

Study typeGuideline
EvidenceLevel 5
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundNurses are pivotal first responders in in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), and timely, guideline-concordant BLS substantially improves survival. While deliberate practice (DP) enhances skill acquisition, the optimal retraining interval for maintaining long-term proficiency among novice nurses remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the effects of single versus repeated DP sessions on the 6-month retention of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) quality and knowledge.MethodsA quasi-experimental study enrolled 148 novice nurses allocated to Single-DP group (baseline training only) a Repeated-DP group (baseline plus a 3-month booster session). CPR quality (compression depth, rate, chest recoil, compression fraction), theoretical knowledge, and overall skill scores were assessed at baseline, immediately after training, and 6-month follow-up. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) assessed group, time, and their interaction.ResultsA total of 148 novice nurses completed the study, with no significant differences in baseline characteristics. Immediately after training, the Single-DP group achieved higher scores in theoretical knowledge (P = 0.001) and overall skill (P = 0.011). At the 6-month follow-up, the Repeated-DP group demonstrated superior retention in raw performance metrics, maintaining significantly greater median compression depth (52.00 vs. 47.50 mm; P = 0.014) and higher overall skill scores (57.72 vs. 54.55; P < 0.001). However, GEE analysis revealed no significant group-by-time interaction at 6 months for knowledge (P = 0.344) or overall skill (P = 0.400), suggesting that the repeated intervention did not yield a statistically significant benefit in adjusted retention rates. Notably, prior real-world CPR experience was identified as a significant predictor of skill retention (P = 0.004).ConclusionDP significantly improves CPR skill proficiency in novice nurses. However, a 3-month refresher did not enhance 6-month retention compared to single training. The finding that prior real-world experience significantly predicts retention underscores the gap between simulation and clinical practice. Therefore, to ensure high-quality patient care, CPR training programs should replace single-session instruction with high-frequency, high-fidelity simulation-based education for novice nurses.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.