Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Scoping review protocol to map catheter management practices in long-term careCatheter Care in Long-Term Care: Review Protocol Launches

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Recognize this as a scoping review protocol only; no findings or practice recommendations are available.

This publication is a protocol for a scoping review, not a completed review or primary study. It describes a planned approach to map the literature on transurethral catheter use and management among residents in long-term care (LTC) homes.

The protocol states that the review aims to identify evidence-informed management practices and to examine work system factors that influence safe and appropriate catheter use. No study population, sample size, intervention, comparator, or outcomes have been reported because the review has not been conducted.

No results, effect sizes, or safety data are available. The authors explicitly note that the document is a protocol and does not contain results. Limitations include the absence of any findings at this stage.

Practice relevance is limited to the stated intent of the planned review: to identify practices and system factors that could support catheter management in LTC settings. Clinicians should recognize that this is an early-stage research plan and that no evidence-based recommendations can be made from it. Funding and conflicts of interest were not reported.

A new paper describes a plan for a scoping review. The review will look at how transurethral catheters are used and managed in long-term care homes. It will also examine work system factors that affect safe and appropriate catheter use.

The paper is a protocol, not a finished study. No results are available yet. The authors have not reported how many studies they will include, what they expect to find, or any outcomes. They also have not reported funding or conflicts of interest.

The main limitation is clear: this is only a plan. It does not provide new evidence or answer questions about safety or best practices. Readers should not expect findings or guidance from this paper.

What this means for patients and families: no conclusions can be drawn yet. The review may later help identify ways to improve catheter care in long-term care, but that work is still ahead.

What this means for you:
This is only a research plan, so no conclusions about catheter care can be drawn yet.

Common questions

What is a scoping review protocol?

A scoping review protocol is a detailed plan for how researchers will search for and summarize existing studies on a topic. It is published before the review is done. This paper is a protocol, so it does not contain results or findings yet.

Does this paper provide new information about catheter safety?

No. The paper is a plan for a future review. It does not report any results, safety data, or outcomes. The authors state that no data or results are available at this stage.

Who will this review focus on?

The planned review will focus on residents in long-term care homes. It will look at transurethral catheter use and management, as well as work system factors that may influence safe and appropriate catheter use.

When will the results of the review be available?

The protocol does not say when the review will be completed or when results will be published. It only describes the planned methods. Readers should look for the full review when it is finished.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
IntroductionTransurethral catheters are a type of urinary catheters that are commonly used in long-term care (LTC) settings to provide wound healing assistance, manage urinary retention and acute urinary obstruction. However, inappropriate and prolonged catheter use increases the risk of complications such as catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), blockages, leakage, trauma and discomfort, which negatively affects resident outcomes. In the LTC context, CAUTIs lead to increased morbidity, prolonged stay in hospitals and overall higher healthcare costs. Although clinical practice guidelines exist to support transurethral catheter management, evidence specific to LTC settings remains limited and has largely focused on clinical outcomes, with less attention given to the human factors and work system conditions that influence catheter-related care. Guided by the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) framework, this scoping review aims to map and synthesize the existing evidence on transurethral catheter use in LTC homes, identify evidence-informed management practices, and examine the work system factors that influence safe and appropriate catheter use.MethodsThe Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology will be followed for the scoping review in adherence to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A preliminary search was conducted in PROSPERO, MEDLINE and Cochrane Databases of Systematic review to refine and review terms, followed by comprehensive and final searches across multiple databases, including PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science and SCOPUS. Study selection will be completed using the Covidence systematic review software and eligible studies will focus on urinary catheter use and management in LTC globally with no date restriction. Studies will be included if full texts are available in English or French. The extracted and synthesized data will then be characterized thematically to identify themes and knowledge gaps.DiscussionThis scoping review will provide an extensive literature synthesis while identifying gaps in practices to enhance catheter management in LTC settings. Guided by the SEIPS framework, this review will examine how interactions among people, tasks, technology, the physical environment, and organizational factors influence transurethral catheter management.Ethics and disseminationThis review acts as a knowledge synthesis tool based on existing literature and thus does not require any ethics approval. Summaries and findings can be used to guide future policies, guidelines, and healthcare reforms.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.