Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Preoperative information packages influence patient preferences in refractive surgeryWhat Patients Actually Want to Know Before Eye Surgery

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider individualized preoperative information strategies to enhance patient satisfaction in refractive surgery.

A systematic review examined preoperative information preferences among 1,194 refractive surgery patients. The study population included 119 patients from a pilot survey phase and 567 from a formal survey phase, with 425 patients passing a consistency check. Data were collected from a Department of Ophthalmology at a tertiary general hospital in Luzhou and a tertiary ophthalmic specialized hospital in Shenzhen, China. The analysis focused on preoperative information packages characterized by psychological support, modes of information interaction feedback, and duration of provision, compared against alternative information packages.

Main results identified psychological support, mode of information interaction feedback, and duration of information provision as core driving factors for patient preferences. Two heterogeneous latent subgroups were identified within the population. Significant overall effects were observed regarding attribute interaction effects, with a Chi-square value of 78.17 and a p-value less than 0.05. Specific uptake probabilities and preference-based subgroups were analyzed, though absolute numbers for these specific metrics were not reported in the source data.

Safety and tolerability data were not reported for the information packages. The review noted that existing studies often adopt a healthcare supply-side perspective and lack a patient-centered approach. Systematic quantitative assessments of information preferences among refractive surgery patients remain scarce. Consequently, while individualized preoperative information can enhance patient satisfaction, the evidence base requires further robust quantitative assessment.

Before the Laser Touches Your Eye

You're about to have laser eye surgery. The procedure will last less than 30 minutes. Your surgeon is experienced. The success rate is high.

And yet — you have a hundred questions you're not sure how to ask.

Refractive surgery (procedures like LASIK and similar treatments that correct vision) has transformed millions of lives. But the information patients receive beforehand varies enormously — and most of it is designed for the clinic's convenience, not the patient's peace of mind.

Why Pre-Surgery Information Matters

Feeling informed before a procedure reduces anxiety, improves cooperation, and leads to better recovery outcomes. This is well-documented across surgical specialties.

But designing that information well is harder than it sounds. Do patients want videos or written brochures? Short sessions or longer consultations? One-way explanations or open dialogue?

Most studies have asked these questions from the hospital's perspective — what's efficient to deliver, not what actually helps the patient.

The Old Way vs. What This Study Did Differently

Traditional approaches to pre-surgical education lean heavily on pamphlets, consent forms, and one-way information sessions. The assumption is that more information equals better preparation.

But here's the twist: this study asked patients directly. Using a method called a discrete choice experiment — where participants repeatedly choose between different hypothetical versions of an information package — researchers identified what people actually prefer when they have to make trade-offs.

Imagine you're asked to choose between two information sessions: one where a doctor explains everything for 20 minutes, or one where you spend 30 minutes asking your own questions and getting direct answers. Which would you pick?

A discrete choice experiment repeats variations of choices like this many times. By analyzing the patterns of what people consistently choose, researchers can figure out which features matter most — and by how much.

It's like revealing your true preferences through behavior, not just asking "what's important to you?" in a survey.

The study surveyed 567 patients at two eye hospitals in China — one a general hospital ophthalmology department, one a specialized eye center. Patients answered a series of structured choice questions about different pre-surgery information formats. Statistical models analyzed the results and identified whether patients naturally fell into different preference groups.

Three features consistently drove patient preferences most strongly: psychological support, the ability to give feedback and ask questions (mode of interaction), and the length of the information session.

Written materials and video content mattered less than the emotional and conversational elements.

Here's Where It Gets Interesting

Researchers also found that patients were not a single homogeneous group. Two distinct subgroups emerged — one more focused on interaction and reassurance, another more focused on specific content and timing.

This means that giving every patient the same pre-surgery briefing may actually fail both groups.

A one-size-fits-all approach leaves some patients under-reassured and others overwhelmed with information they didn't need.

What the Experts Say

The authors argue that pre-surgical education should move away from provider-centered models toward patient-centered approaches. Rather than determining what information is most convenient to deliver, clinics should ask what patients need in order to feel genuinely prepared.

The study also found that supplementary information after the main session — time to follow up with questions — was valued highly, particularly among the group that prioritized interaction.

If you're preparing for LASIK or another vision-correcting procedure, you have more right than you might realize to ask for the kind of preparation you need. It's reasonable to request one-on-one time to ask questions, not just a packet to read at home. If your clinic doesn't offer that, asking specifically to speak with someone can make a real difference in how you feel going into the procedure.

The study was conducted in China, and patient communication preferences can vary by culture. The findings may not directly translate to patients in the US, Europe, or other regions. The survey also relied on hypothetical choices rather than real-world behavior, which may not perfectly reflect what people do under actual surgical conditions.

What Comes Next

Researchers suggest that future studies test whether implementing preference-matched information programs actually improves patient outcomes and satisfaction. The next step would be moving from preference measurement to clinical implementation — designing systems that can quickly identify which type of patient someone is, and tailor the pre-surgery education accordingly.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundIndividualized preoperative information can enhance patient satisfaction. However, existing studies have methodological limitations, largely adopting a healthcare “supply-side” perspective and lacking a patient-centered approach. Moreover, systematic quantitative assessments of information preferences among refractive surgery patients remain scarce.SettingsDepartment of Ophthalmology at a tertiary general hospital in Luzhou and a tertiary ophthalmic specialized hospital in Shenzhen, China.ParticipantsA total of 119 patients in the pilot survey phase, and 567 patients in the formal survey phase.MethodsAttributes and levels were identified through literature review, qualitative interviews, expert panel consultation and importance ranking. An orthogonal design was generated using Ngene for pilot choice sets, with a D-efficient design subsequently optimized for the main survey. Model estimation was performed in Stata 17.0, commencing with a multinomial logit (MNL) model and a random parameters logit (RPL) model to capture unobserved preference heterogeneity. A latent class logit (LCL) model was subsequently estimated to identify preference-based subgroups. Attribute interaction effects were examined to explore potential complementarities and substitutabilities. Finally, Scenario prediction analysis were conducted to predict the uptake probabilities of alternative information packages.ResultsA total of 10,200 choice observations (425 patients) passed the consistency check. Psychological support, mode of information interaction feedback, and duration of information provision were identified as the core driving factors, and two heterogeneous latent subgroups were identified. Joint analysis of attribute interactions showed significant overall effects [χ2 (21) = 78.17, p
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.