This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized data from seven randomized controlled trials focusing on adults with non-specific chronic low back pain. The primary comparison assessed yoga interventions against standard exercise-based controls. Outcomes measured included pain intensity, physical function, disability, and emotional wellbeing.
The analysis indicated that yoga was not statistically superior to exercise comparators for pain intensity, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of –0.52 (95% CI –1.38 to 0.35). Similarly, no clear between-group difference was observed for disability, showing an SMD of –0.19 (95% CI –1.11 to 0.73). However, yoga demonstrated a significant improvement in physical function compared to exercise controls, with an SMD of –1.20 (95% CI –1.64 to –0.77). Additionally, emotional wellbeing improved in the yoga group relative to controls, with an SMD of –0.71 (95% CI –1.26 to –0.16).
Safety data, including adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability, were not reported in the included studies. Key limitations include a limited evidence pool of only two studies contributing to the physical function analysis and high heterogeneity identified across the synthesis. Consequently, yoga's comparative superiority in this domain should be interpreted as a preliminary observation from this specific evidence base rather than a definitive clinical conclusion.
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundChronic low back pain (CLBP) is a prevalent condition associated with persistent pain, functional limitations, and psychological distress. Yoga is frequently recommended as an active, mind body intervention, yet it remains uncertain whether yoga provides added benefit compared with other exercise based programs.ObjectiveTo compare the effects of yoga versus active exercise interventions on pain intensity, physical function or disability, and emotional wellbeing in adults with CLBP.MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in line with PRISMA 2020 and the Cochrane Handbook, and registered in PROSPERO. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and PEDro were searched from inception to November 23, 2025. Parallel-group randomized controlled trials enrolling adults with non-specific CLBP were included when they compared yoga with exercise based interventions and reported extractable continuous outcomes. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using fixed or random effects models based on heterogeneity. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tool.ResultsSeven randomized controlled trials were included. For pain, yoga was not statistically superior to exercise comparators (SMD = –0.52, 95% CI –1.38–0.35; I2 = 95%). For physical function, yoga showed a significant improvement compared to exercise controls (SMD = –1.20, 95% CI –1.64 to –0.77; I2 = 31%); however, this specific finding is based on a limited evidence pool of only two studies. For disability, no clear between-group difference was observed (SMD = -0.19, 95% CI –1.11–0.73; I2 = 92%). For emotional outcomes, yoga improved emotional wellbeing compared with exercise controls (SMD = –0.71, 95% CI –1.26 to –0.16; I2 = 75%), and this effect became more consistent after removing one influential study (I2 = 0%).ConclusionBased on the results of the current meta-analysis, yoga demonstrated statistically significant improvements in physical function and emotional wellbeing compared to active exercise interventions, while no consistent advantage was observed for pain or disability. These findings are specific to the limited evidence base and high heterogeneity identified in this study; therefore, while the data indicates positive trends, yoga’s comparative superiority should be viewed as a preliminary observation from this synthesis rather than a definitive clinical conclusion.