Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Ectopic IUD and calculus caused a 1-cm distal ureteral stricture in a woman with uterus didelphysEctopic IUD Found Linked to Severe Kidney Obstruction

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that an ectopic IUD or calculus may cause a fixed ureteral stricture requiring surgical reconstruction.

This case report describes a single 48-year-old woman presenting with ureterohydronephrosis and uterus didelphys. Imaging revealed severe right hydroureteronephrosis, focal distal ureteral narrowing, and an ectopic metallic IUD located outside both uterine cavities. Surgical exploration and reconstruction were performed to address the obstruction.

Intraoperative findings confirmed an intact IUD with an attached calculus externally compressing a 1-cm fixed distal ureteral stricture. Following open ureteral exploration and reconstruction, the patient showed marked decompression of the right collecting system. At a 6-month follow-up, no residual pelvic metallic device was present, and serum creatinine was normal.

The authors note that original records for the initial IUD removal were unavailable. The report suggests an association between the ectopic IUD/calculus and the ureteral obstruction. Clinicians should note that a history of IUD removal does not confirm the absence of a device if retrieval is not documented. Furthermore, a fixed stricture may require reconstruction even after the removal of an ectopic device.

A medical report describes a 48-year-old woman who experienced severe hydroureteronephrosis, which is a blockage and swelling of the kidney and ureter. Imaging showed a narrow point in the ureter and an IUD located outside of the uterine cavity.

During surgery, doctors found that the IUD was still intact. It was attached to a stone and was physically pressing against a 1-centimeter fixed narrowing in the ureter. This combination of the misplaced device and the stone caused the blockage.

After the surgical reconstruction, the kidney system was successfully decompressed. At a six-month follow-up, no metal devices remained. Because this is a single case report, the findings are limited to this one patient. It serves as a reminder that a history of IUD removal does not always mean a device is gone, and a physical blockage may still require surgery even after a device is removed.

What this means for you:
A single case shows how an ectopic IUD and a stone can cause a serious kidney blockage requiring surgery.

Common questions

What caused the kidney blockage in this patient?

The blockage was caused by an intact IUD that was located outside the uterine cavity. This device was attached to a stone and was pressing against a 1-centimeter fixed narrowing in the ureter. This combination of the misplaced device and the stone led to the severe swelling of the kidney system.

Was the patient's condition resolved after surgery?

Yes, the surgery resulted in a marked decompression of the right collecting system. At the six-month follow-up, the medical team confirmed that no metallic devices remained in the area and the kidney system was successfully treated.

What does this case mean for patients with IUDs?

This single case highlights that a history of IUD removal does not always guarantee the device is gone if it was not documented as successfully removed. It also shows that a fixed narrowing in the ureter may still need surgery even after an ectopic device is removed.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedOct 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundAn ectopic intrauterine device (IUD) can rarely cause ureteral obstruction and hydroureteronephrosis. Diagnosis may be delayed when a prior removal procedure is believed to have been complete.Case presentationA 48-year-old woman presented with a 1-year history of right flank pain and urinary frequency after repeated treatment for presumed urinary tract infection and possible genitourinary tuberculosis without sustained improvement. More than 20 years earlier, an IUD had been inserted before uterus didelphys was recognized. Two to three years later, an unintended pregnancy led to recognition of the duplicated uterine anatomy, induced abortion, and an IUD removal procedure. The original records were unavailable, so device location and intact retrieval at that time could not be verified. Multimodality imaging at the index admission showed severe right hydroureteronephrosis, focal distal ureteral narrowing, and an ectopic metallic IUD outside both uterine cavities; cystoscopy was unremarkable. Open ureteral exploration and reconstruction identified an intact IUD with an attached calculus externally compressing an approximately 1-cm fixed distal ureteral stricture without entering the ureteral lumen. The narrowing persisted after device removal, requiring segmental ureteral resection and anastomosis over a double-J stent. Histopathology of the resected ureter showed chronic inflammatory changes without tuberculous changes. The stent was removed 2 months postoperatively. At 6 months after surgery, computed tomography showed marked decompression of the right collecting system and no residual pelvic metallic device; serum creatinine remained normal.ConclusionA history of IUD removal should not be treated as proof of device absence when intact retrieval is undocumented. In otherwise unexplained unilateral ureteral obstruction, a remote IUD history should prompt review of prior device localization and targeted pelvic imaging, particularly when historical records are unavailable or duplicated uterine anatomy complicates localization. A fixed stricture may require reconstruction even after the ectopic device is removed.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.