Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Retrospective cohort study assesses clinical improvement prediction in adult acute organophosphate poisoning cases.

Retrospective cohort study assesses clinical improvement prediction in adult acute organophosphate p…
Photo by National Cancer Institute / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note retrospective cohort data for risk stratification in acute organophosphate poisoning, noting unreported safety details.

This retrospective cohort study evaluated outcomes in 138 adult acute organophosphate poisoning cases. The population consisted of patients admitted with acute organophosphate poisoning. Follow-up duration was 48 h. Medications listed included atropine and pralidoxime. The setting was not reported. Study location was not reported.

While specific intervention or comparator details were not reported, the study assessed clinical improvement defined as any reduction in the poisoning symptom score (PSS) within 48 h post-admission. Primary results indicated discrimination with an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.930 in the training cohort and 0.905 in the validation cohort. Calibration metrics showed a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.034 and 0.066. These performance metrics suggest the tool may distinguish improvement status.

Safety data regarding adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability were not reported. The study did not report funding or conflicts of interest. Limitations were not explicitly listed in the provided data.

Practice relevance includes enhancing early risk stratification, guiding clinical decisions, and supporting efficient ICU resource utilization. However, the observational nature limits causal inference. Clinicians should interpret these metrics cautiously given the retrospective design and lack of reported safety data. These findings may inform future prospective clinical investigations.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundAcute organophosphate (OP) poisoning outcomes vary significantly despite standard atropine/pralidoxime (PAM) therapy. Early identification of patients likely to improve rapidly could optimize resource allocation and individualized care.MethodsThis retrospective study analyzed 138 adult acute OP poisoning cases (2018–2023). Patients were randomly split into training (n = 96) and validation (n = 42) cohorts. LASSO regression analyzed 14 potential predictors (demographics, clinical presentation, labs) to select features with non-zero coefficients at the 1-SE λ threshold. These were used in multivariable logistic regression to develop a nomogram predicting clinical improvement (any reduction in the poisoning symptom score (PSS) within 48 h post-admission). Model validation included discrimination (ROC/AUC), calibration [calibration plots and mean absolute error (MAE)], and clinical utility (decision curve analysis, DCA).ResultsFour independent predictors were identified: baseline PSS, admission serum cholinesterase, admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, and major comorbidities. The nomogram showed strong discrimination (optimism-corrected AUC 0.930 in the training cohort; AUC 0.905 in the validation cohort) and good calibration (MAE 0.034 and 0.066). Decision-curve analysis showed positive net benefit over treat-all and treat-none across clinically relevant thresholds.ConclusionWe developed and validated a practical nomogram predicting 48-h symptom relief in acute OP poisoning. This tool can enhance early risk stratification, guide clinical decisions, and support efficient ICU resource utilization.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.