Narrative review on non-infectious uveitis and scleritis treatment gaps

This is a narrative review that synthesizes evidence on the management of non-infectious uveitis and scleritis. The authors' scope was to identify research gaps and limitations in the current evidence base. The review does not report pooled effect sizes, specific study populations, or intervention outcomes, as these details were not provided in the source material.

The key finding is that areas of gaps in research are a noted limitation for these conditions. The authors do not present specific numerical results or comparative effectiveness data. The synthesis is qualitative, focusing on the need for further investigation rather than reporting definitive clinical outcomes.

The review acknowledges that the evidence base has notable limitations, including gaps in research. It does not report on safety, tolerability, or practice relevance, as these were not detailed in the source. The authors' conclusions are cautious, emphasizing the preliminary nature of the available evidence.

Clinicians should interpret this review as an overview of current knowledge gaps rather than a guide to specific treatments. The lack of reported data on interventions, comparators, or outcomes limits direct practice application. Further research is needed to inform clinical decision-making for non-infectious uveitis and scleritis.