Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=1,221 Randomized Treatment

Epothilone (Ixabepilone) Plus Capecitabine Versus Capecitabine Alone in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00082433 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
1,221
Serious AEs
33.1%
Results posted
Aug 2009
Primary outcomePrimary: Overall Survival (OS) — 16.39; 15.64 months — p=.1162

Summary

The purpose of this clinical research study is to learn if BMS-247550 added to the approved therapy of capecitabine (Xeloda) provides measurable clinical benefits over capecitabine alone in women with metastatic breast cancer. Patients should have previously received an anthracycline and a taxane. The safety of this treatment will also be studied.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Overall Survival (OS)
16.39; 15.64 .1162
SECONDARY
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
6.24; 4.40 .0005 sig
SECONDARY
Response Rate (RR)
43.3; 28.8 <.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Duration of Response
6.1; 6.3
SECONDARY
Time to Response
6.6; 6.6
SECONDARY
Treatment-Related Safety Summary
19; 42; 125; 64; 458; 240
SECONDARY
Symptom Assessment Score Changes From Baseline for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Symptom Index (FBSI)
-0.5; 0.0; -0.9; 0.5; -1.5; 0.7 <0.0001 sig

Eligibility Criteria

  • Patients must have received prior treatment which included both an anthracycline (i.e., doxorubicin or epirubicin) and a taxane (i.e., paclitaxel or docetaxel).
  • Patients must have received no more than two prior chemotherapy regimens. Patients who have not received treatment for metastatic disease must have relapsed within one year.
  • Patients may not have any history of brain and/or leptomeningeal metastases.
  • Patients may not have Grade 2 or worse neuropathy at the time of study entry.
  • Patients may not have had prior treatment with any epothilones and/or capecitabine (i.e. Xeloda)
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00082433). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search