Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 Completed N=264 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

Three Dose Levels of CP-690,550 Monotherapy Versus Placebo, Administered Orally Twice Daily (BID) for 6 Weeks

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00147498 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
264
Serious AEs
3.8%
Results posted
Jan 2013
Primary outcomePrimary: Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 6 — 70.49; 81.16; 76.81; 29.23 percentage of participants

Summary

The study's objective is to compare the efficacy of 3 dose levels of oral CP-690,550 monotherapy (5 mg, 15 mg, and 30 mg twice daily [BID]) versus placebo administered over 6 weeks for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 6
70.49; 81.16; 76.81; 29.23
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
27.87; 43.48; 56.52; 12.31; 50.82; 71.01
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
6.56; 8.70; 18.84; 3.08; 9.84; 23.19
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
1.64; 4.35; 4.35; 0.00; 4.92; 4.35
SECONDARY
Area Under the Numeric Index of American College of Rheumatology Response (ACR-n) Curve
857.50; 1086.90; 1211.93; -546.41
SECONDARY
Tender Joints Count (TJC)
32.37; 26.98; 29.52; 30.61; 23.49; 16.62
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Tender Joints Count (TJC) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
-7.06; -11.70; -14.14; -2.74; -11.68; -15.66
SECONDARY
Swollen Joints Count (SJC)
21.33; 16.42; 19.53; 19.97; 14.77; 9.90
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joints Count (SJC) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
-5.02; -8.20; -9.00; -3.19; -7.83; -11.33
SECONDARY
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis
71.03; 69.37; 63.99; 65.73; 49.89; 45.36
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
-17.98; -21.56; -26.16; -5.18; -22.06; -25.71
SECONDARY
Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
69.39; 64.11; 66.65; 67.75; 49.85; 37.80
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
-17.13; -28.25; -30.89; -12.25; -25.43; -36.60
SECONDARY
Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
69.46; 67.47; 68.13; 64.17; 51.76; 46.11
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
-15.01; -19.74; -29.66; -3.30; -21.44; -26.10
SECONDARY
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
1.75; 1.66; 1.61; 1.71; 1.46; 1.37
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
-0.25; -0.30; -0.44; -0.05; -0.39; -0.50
SECONDARY
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
31.25; 25.47; 28.10; 22.28; 15.98; 7.57
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
-15.28; -18.29; -21.38; -0.24; -16.74; -18.89
SECONDARY
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
6.17; 5.69; 5.91; 6.00; 5.29; 4.42
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8
-0.84; -1.28; -1.65; -0.39; -1.19; -1.91
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
31; 25; 17; 35; 0; 0

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • The subject has a history of inadequate response to at least 1, but no more than 4, of the following DMARDs: sulfasalazine, injectable gold, methotrexate, leflunomide, cyclosporine, or a thiopurine derivative (azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine)

Exclusion Criteria

  • Current Therapy With Any DMARD Or Biologic
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00147498). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search