Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=2,804 Randomized Treatment

The Twin Birth Study: A Trial Comparing Planned Vaginal Birth to Elective Caesarean Section of Twins

Twin Pregnancy

Enrolled (actual)
2,804
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: Perinatal/Neonatal Mortality and/or Serious Neonatal Morbidity — 60; 52; 24; 17 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Method of Delivery (Procedure)
Age
Pediatric, Adult · 15+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Primary completion
May 2011

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Perinatal/Neonatal Mortality and/or Serious Neonatal Morbidity
60; 52; 24; 17; 13; 9
SECONDARY
Neonatal Morbidity
0; 4; 1; 1; 0; 1
SECONDARY
Death or Poor Neurodevelopmental Outcome of the Children at 2 Years of Age (Corrected for Gestational Age at Birth)
24; 17; 11; 6; 104; 110
SECONDARY
Problematic Urinary or Faecal/Flatal Incontinence of Mothers at 2 Years Postpartum
187; 250; 93; 140; 47; 68

Summary

For twin pregnancies at 32-38 weeks gestation, where twin A is head down, does a policy of planned caesarean section (CS) lower the likelihood of death or serious illness, during the first 28 days after birth, compared to a plan for vaginal birth (VB)?

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Women at 32 0/7 - 38 6/7 weeks gestation
  • Estimated fetal weight of each fetus 1500 - 4000 g
  • Both twins alive at time of randomization
  • Twin A is in cephalic position

Exclusion Criteria

  • Monoamniotic twins
  • Lethal fetal anomaly of either fetus
  • Contraindication to labour or vaginal delivery for either twin
  • Previous participation in the Twin Birth Study
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00187369). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search