N/A
Completed N=812
Community Interventions in Non-medical Settings to Increase Informed Decision Making for Prostate Cancer Screening
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00207636 ↗Enrolled (actual)
812
Serious AEs
—
Results posted
Jan 2025
Primary outcomePrimary: Percentage of Patients Who Were Ready to Make a Decision or Were Undecided — 134; 90; 144; 125 Participants
Summary
The purpose of this study is to develop and evaluate a computer-based decision aid (DA) for use by men considering prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer. Major medical organizations recommend that men discuss the risks and benefits of this test with their physician before making the decision. This educational, interactive DA will help them prepare for that discussion.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Percentage of Patients Who Were Ready to Make a Decision or Were Undecided |
134; 90; 144; 125; 200; 201 | — |
| PRIMARY Percentage of Correct Responses in Assessing Mens' Recognition of the Prostate-specific Antigen Test and Knowledge Related to Prostate-cancer Topics. |
56; 56; 60; 66 | — |
| PRIMARY Mean and Standard Error of a Scale Used to Assess Men's Confidence Level in Making Decisions Related to Prostate Cancer Screening. |
79; 83; 79; 83 | — |
| PRIMARY Percentage of Consistency Between Screening Preference and Personal Values Relevant to the Screening Decision |
244; 207; 247; 201; 87; 81 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Men Who Have Active Decision-making, Collaborative Decision-making, or Passive Decision-making Styles |
305; 274; 308; 277; 28; 15 | — |
| SECONDARY Mean and Standard Error of a Scale to Measure Decisional Conflict |
28; 25; 20; 14 | — |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Worksites employing at least 100 men in target age group (45-65 years old)
Exclusion Criteria
- Worksites with high turnover
- Non-English speaking workers
- Temporary or contract workers
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00207636). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.