Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=256 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Efficacy Study Measuring the Impact of Pregabalin on Peripheral Neuropathic Pain.

Neuropathic Pain

Enrolled (actual)
256
Serious AEs
Results posted
Jun 2009
Primary outcome: Primary: Neuropathic Pain in Subjects With Peripheral Neuropathic Pain Conditions During the Double-blind Phase — 2.84; 3.62 score on scale — p=0.0018

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Pregabalin (Lyrica) (Drug); Placebo (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
Primary completion
Feb 2008

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Neuropathic Pain in Subjects With Peripheral Neuropathic Pain Conditions During the Double-blind Phase
2.84; 3.62 0.0018 sig
SECONDARY
Weekly Mean Pain Scores During the Single-blind Treatment Phase
6.29; 3.79
SECONDARY
Weekly Mean Pain Scores During the Double Blind Treatment Phase
2.68; 2.49; 2.62; 3.14; 2.75; 3.40
SECONDARY
Change in Pain Scores During Double Blind Treatment Phase
-0.01; 0.71; 0.08; 1.05; -0.06; 0.87 0.0010 sig
SECONDARY
Number of Subjects With >= 30% Reduction in Mean Pain Score During Single-blind Treatment
165; 90
SECONDARY
Mean Pain Score for Responders at End of Single-blind Treatment Phase. Change From Baseline of Mean of Last 7 Available Pain Scores From Daily Pain Diary While on Single-blind Treatment.
-3.60
SECONDARY
Mean Pain Score for Non-responders at End of Single-blind Treatment Phase
-0.49
SECONDARY
Categorized Daily Pain Score
3.3; 0.9; 19.5; 17.4; 7.4; 8.6
SECONDARY
Time to Meaningful Increase in Pain During Double-blind Treatment Phase (Number of Participants)
28; 28
SECONDARY
Mean Sleep Interference Score
1.81; 2.52 0.0031 sig
SECONDARY
Weekly Mean Sleep Interference Scores During the Single-Blind Treatment Phase
4.80; 2.72
SECONDARY
Weekly Mean Sleep Interference Scores During the Double Blind Treatment Phase
1.68; 1.62; 1.76; 2.24; 1.85; 2.53
SECONDARY
Change in Sleep Interference Scores During Double Blind Treatment Phase
0.07; 0.59; 0.10; 0.97; -0.03; 0.78 0.0177 sig
SECONDARY
Intensity of Neuropathic Pain -Visual Analog Scale (NeP - VAS)
6.9; 15.9 0.0069 sig
SECONDARY
Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Responses
-0.1; 1.2; -0.4; 0.8 0.0023 sig
SECONDARY
Change in Pain Treatment Satisfaction Scale (PTSS)
-1.96; -7.95; -1.86; -8.35 0.0828
SECONDARY
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Categories by Number of Subjects
21; 12; 35; 32; 15; 17 0.0278 sig
SECONDARY
Change in Modified Brief Pain Inventory (mBPI) for Pain Interference or Pain Severity.
0.16; 0.92; 0.29; 1.06 0.0049 sig
SECONDARY
Change in Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D) Health State Profile and Visual Analog Scale Components
-0.01; -0.07; -0.03; -2.09 0.0719

Summary

This study will measure the impact of treatment with pregabalin in adult men and women who have a diagnosis of peripheral neuropathic pain (pain caused by a primary lesion of the peripheral nervous system such as Diabetic peripheral Neuropathy and Postherpetic Neuralgia).

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subjects presenting a diagnosis of peripheral neuropathic pain, defined as pain caused by a lesion of the peripheral nervous system manifesting with sensory symptoms and signs, for at least 6 months at screening.
  • At baseline, subjects must have completed at least 4 daily pain diaries and must have a mean weekly pain score equal or greater than 4.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Presence of any of the following diagnoses: Cervical or lumbo-sacral radiculopathy; Operated or non-operated chronic low back pain Carpal tunnel syndrome or any other entrapment-related neuropathic pain (defined as pain associated with focal nerve lesion produced by constriction or mechanical distortion of the nerve, within a fibrous or fibro-osseous tunnel, or by a fibrous band) ; Complex regional pain syndrome (type 1 and 2); Fibromyalgia.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00219544). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search