Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=182 Randomized Treatment

Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Iron Versus Oral Iron in Chronic Renal Failure Subjects With Anemia

Anemia

Enrolled (actual)
182
Serious AEs
8.8%
Results posted
Mar 2010
Primary outcome: Primary: Patients With an Increase in Hemoglobin >= 1gm/dL. — 35; 23 participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Venofer (Drug); Ferrous Sulfate (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
American Regent, Inc.
Primary completion
Oct 2004

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Patients With an Increase in Hemoglobin >= 1gm/dL.
35; 23
SECONDARY
Number of Subjects With a Clinical Response
31; 1
SECONDARY
Highest Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin (g/dL) up to Day 56
1.1; .8
SECONDARY
Highest Change From Baseline in Ferritin (ng/mL) up to Day 56
391.7; 45
SECONDARY
Mean Change in Ferritin (ng/mL) From Baseline to Day 56
230; 30
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in Serum Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) (%) at Day 56
8.5; 5.5
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin (g/dL) at Day 56
.7; .3

Summary

To assess the safety and efficacy of two forms of iron therapy for the treatment of anemia in non-dialysis dependent, chronic renal failure in patients receiving or not receiving erythropoietin.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Hemoglobin < or = 11.5 gm/dL
  • Stable dose or not receiving EPO
  • Renal Anemia

Exclusion Criteria

  • IV iron with last 6 months
  • Chronic infection, malignancy,major surgery within last month
  • Blood Transfusion with last two months
  • Significant blood loss within last 3 months
  • Concomitant sever diseases of the liver
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00236977). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search