Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=666 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as First-line Immunosuppression (BENEFIT)

Chronic Kidney Disease · Chronic Kidney Failure
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00256750 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
666
Serious AEs
74.4%
Results posted
Aug 2016
Primary outcomePrimary: Percent of Participants Surviving With a Functioning Graft by Month 12 — 92.8; 96.5; 95.4 percentage of participants
◆ Published Evidence
Highly cited
761citations · ~76 / year
Belatacept and Long-Term Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation.
The New England journal of medicine · 2016 · Open access · Likely link

Summary

The purpose of this study is to learn if Belatacept can provide protection from organ rejection following kidney transplantation while avoiding some of the toxic effects of standard immunosuppressive medications such as kidney damage. Effects on kidney function and patient survival as well as drug safety will also be studied.

Linked Publications (3)

  • Belatacept and Long-Term Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation.
    The New England journal of medicine · 2016 · 761 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Three-year outcomes from BENEFIT, a randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group study in adult kidney transplant recipients.
    American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2012 · 308 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Beneficial effect of belatacept on health-related quality of life and perceived side effects: results from the BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT trials.
    Transplantation · 2014 · 37 citations · Open access · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percent of Participants Surviving With a Functioning Graft by Month 12
92.8; 96.5; 95.4
PRIMARY
Percent of Participants With a Composite of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR) Less Than 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 at Month 12 or With a Decrease in mGFR Greater Than or Equal to 10 mL/Min/1.73m^2 From Month 3 to Month 12
77.9; 54.2; 55.0 <.0001 sig
PRIMARY
Percent of Participants Experiencing Acute Rejection (AR) Post-transplant by Month 12
7.2; 17.3; 21.9
SECONDARY
Mean Value of the Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR)
51.9; 61.7; 59.9; 50.4; 63.4; 65.0 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Percent of Participants With Prevalence of Chronic Allograft Nephropathy (CAN) at Month 12
32.4; 23.9; 18.3 0.0581
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events by Month 84
9; 7; 7; 107; 113; 117
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest by Month 84
22; 16; 20; 19; 24; 20
SECONDARY
Mean Blood Pressure at Month 84
78.6; 75.8; 75.1; 129.0; 126.7; 126.0
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria Post-transplant by Month 36
26; 25; 27; 0; 1; 0
SECONDARY
Percent of Participants With Development of Anti-Donor HLA Positive Antibodies by Month 84
11.6; 3.1; 1.4
SECONDARY
Mean Change of the Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR) From Month 3 to Month 12 and From Month 3 to Month 24
-1.7; 1.2; 4.4; -2.0; 5.3; 4.2
SECONDARY
Percent of Participants With a Decrease in Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR) Greater Than or Equal to 10mL/Min/1.73m^2 From Month 3 to Month 12
28.2; 23.4; 23.0
SECONDARY
Percent of Participants With a Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR) Less Than 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 at Month 12
67.6; 43; 43.5
SECONDARY
Mean Value of the Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR) With Imputation
48.8; 62.6; 62.4; 50.1; 65.4; 65.2
SECONDARY
Mean Change in Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR) From Month 6 to Month 12
2.3; 4.7; 5.1
SECONDARY
Percent of Participants With Incidence of New Onset Diabetes Mellitus by Month 36
9.9; 4.2; 7.1; 10.5; 5.4; 8.3 0.0687
SECONDARY
Percent of Participants Using At Least One Anti-Hypertensive Medication to Control Hypertension at Month 36
92.9; 81.9; 83.9 0.0002 sig
SECONDARY
Percent of Participants With Incidence of Hypertension Post-Transplantation at Month 12
75.0; 53.8; 57.1
SECONDARY
Percent of Participants With Prevalence of Hypertension Post-Transplantation at Month 12
91.0; 89.8; 88.6
SECONDARY
Mean Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure
138.7; 131.4; 132.7; 81.9; 78.7; 79.3
SECONDARY
Percent of Participants at Baseline With Controlled Hypertension Post Transplantation by Month 12
21.4; 28.6; 24.6
SECONDARY
Percent of Participants With Prevalence of Controlled Hypertension at Month 12
21.0; 28.0; 24.7
SECONDARY
Percent of Non-dyslipidemic Participants With Incidence of Dyslipidemia Post-Transplantation by Month 12
80.0; 63.8; 70.9
SECONDARY
Percent of Participants With Prevalence of Dyslipidemia at Month 12
52.9; 44.7; 46.1
SECONDARY
Percent of Participants With Controlled Dyslipidemia at Month 12
18.1; 15.5; 15.5
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Antihyperlipidemic Medication by Intensity Level
17; 15; 17; 46; 27; 39
SECONDARY
Percent of Participants Using At Least One Anti-Hyperlipidemic Medication
56.6; 46.2; 47.9
SECONDARY
Mean Value of Lipid Parameters
144.1; 131.5; 131.7; 191.5; 182.4; 181.3
SECONDARY
Percent of Participants With Prevalence of Acute Rejection (AR) by Month 36
5.4; 16.8; 21.9; 9.0; 17.3; 24.2
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Acute Rejection (AR) Post-transplant in Terms of Severity Using Banff Grades by Month 36
1; 4; 7; 5; 9; 3
SECONDARY
Percent of Participants Using Polyclonal Antilymphocyte Preparations for Impaired Renal Function and Anticipated Delayed Graft Function by Month 12
3.6; 0.4; 0.5
SECONDARY
Percent of Participants Using Lymphocyte Depleting Therapy (LDT) for the Initial Treatment of Acute Rejection (AR) by Month 36
0.5; 4.4; 5.9; 0.9; 4.4; 5.9
SECONDARY
Percent of Participants With Corticosteroid Resistant Acute Rejection (AR) by Month 36
0.0; 4.0; 5.9; 0.0; 5.3; 6.4
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Who Recovered Completely From an Episode of Acute Rejection (AR) by Month 12
13; 29; 39; 13; 34; 43
SECONDARY
Percent of Participants With Subclinical Rejection at Month 12
5.2; 4.7; 4.3
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Treated for Acute Rejection (AR) Regardless of Histological Findings by Month 36
43; 68; 70; 56; 72; 75
SECONDARY
Mean Value of Physical and Mental Components Using SF-36 Questionnaire
49.4; 49.9; 51.1; 47.3; 48.9; 49.2 0.6573
SECONDARY
Mean Value of the Eight Domain Scores of Quality of Life Using SF-36 Questionnaire
50.6; 52.5; 52.7; 47.9; 48.2; 49.0 0.0714
SECONDARY
Mean Relative to an Identified Distribution (Ridit) Value of Symptom Occurrence and Symptom Distress Using Modified Transplant Symptom Occurrence and Symptom Distress Scale (MTSOSDS-59R)
0.4643; 0.4407; 0.4451; 0.4721; 0.4495; 0.4459 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Mean Changes in the Value of Physical and Mental Components Using SF-36 From Baseline Up To Months 6, 12, 24, and 36
5.4; 6.2; 7.3; 5.0; 6.2; 6.7 0.4498
SECONDARY
Mean Change in the Value of the Eight Domain Scores Using SF-36 From Baseline Up To Months 6, 12, 24, and 36
2.9; 4.5; 4.6; 6.7; 7.1; 7.3
SECONDARY
Percent of Participants Surviving With a Functioning Graft
90.5; 94.7; 94.1; 88.7; 92.0; 92.2
SECONDARY
Percent of Participants With Composite Endpoint or Death, Graft Loss or Acute Rejection by Month 36
13.6; 19.5; 25.1; 18.1; 19.9; 27.9

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • The subject is a recipient of a living donor or deceased donor kidney transplant.
  • Male or Female, 18 or older

Exclusion Criteria

  • First time recipient, PRA >- 50% or for retransplantation PRA >- 30%.
  • If retransplantation, previous graft loss cannot be due to acute rejection.
  • Positive cross match.
  • Subject receiving extended criteria donor (ECD) organ
  • For Long-term extension study-Subjects who have completed three years of study treatment (through Week 156)
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00256750) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search