Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=755 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

Treatment of Early Aggressive Rheumatoid Arthritis (TEAR)

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Enrolled (actual)
755
Serious AEs
13.4%
Results posted
Jul 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Disease Activity Score Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate(DAS28-ESR) — 3.0; 2.9; 3.1; 2.8 Scores on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
methotrexate (Drug); sulfasalazine (Drug); hydroxychloroquine (Drug); etanercept (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Primary completion
Jun 2009

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Disease Activity Score Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate(DAS28-ESR)
3.0; 2.9; 3.1; 2.8
SECONDARY
Radiographic Disease Progression Between Baseline and Week 102 as Assessed by Van Der Heijde Modified Sharp Scores.
7.0; 7.3; 4.8; 6.2

Summary

The purpose of this study is to 1)to determine if it is better to treat all early RA patients with methotrexate in combination with hydroxychloroquine plus sulfasalazine or in combination with etanercept or reserve this treatment for patients who do not appropriately respond to methotrexate alone and 2) to determine which combination of methotrexate therapy is better

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Have a diagnosis of RA for less than or equal to 3 years
  • Be 18 years of age or older at the time of diagnosis

Exclusion Criteria

  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • History of chronic infection, such as hepatitis, pneumonia, or chronic skin infections
  • Active TB or evidence of latent TB
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00259610). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search