Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=40 Randomized Single-blind Other

Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Hip Versus Standard Approach

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00261040 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
40
Serious AEs
5.0%
Results posted
Mar 2020
Primary outcomePrimary: Clinical Outcomes — 5.39; 5.74 Days

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a difference in terms of length of hospital stay and post-operative outcomes between patients whose total hip replacement surgery is performed with a minimally invasive versus standard surgical approach.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Clinical Outcomes
5.39; 5.74
SECONDARY
Harris Hip Score
90.4031; 90.3011
SECONDARY
Change in Timed Get-up-and-Go Test (TUG)
11.01; 12.03
SECONDARY
Operating Time Duration
95.20; 87.70
SECONDARY
Estimated Blood Loss
460; 462.50

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

BMI > 30 kg/m2 No prior ipsilateral hip surgery Osteoarthritis

Exclusion Criteria

Patients with grossly distorted bony anatomy whereby standard implants are contraindicated; i.e. congenital dysplasia of the hip, proximal femoral abnormalities, etc

Rheumatoid Arthritis

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00261040). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search