Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=32 Randomized Treatment

Laser Light Cues for Gait Freezing in Parkinson's Disease

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00320242 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
32
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jul 2017
Primary outcomePrimary: Mean Change From Baseline (Visit 1 Until Visit 2) to Endpoint (After Visit 2 Until Visit 3) in the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire Score. — 1.25 change in FOGQ score — p=0.0152

Summary

The purpose of this study is to gather data to see if the Laser Cane and/or U-Step Walker with laser accessory is more effective in aiding with gait freezing than a regular cane/U-Step Walker in patients who have idiopathic Parkinson's disease.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Mean Change From Baseline (Visit 1 Until Visit 2) to Endpoint (After Visit 2 Until Visit 3) in the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire Score.
1.25 0.0152 sig
SECONDARY
Mean Change in Time to Perform the Timed Gait Test With vs Without the Laser Feature
65; 57.6 0.005 sig
SECONDARY
Mean Change in Number of Falls Without Versus With the Laserlight Visual Cue.
3.23; 2.12 0.02 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage Change in Falls
39.5 0.002 sig

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subjects or a designated proxy have given informed consent
  • Subject has been diagnosed with idiopathic Parkinson's disease
  • Subject is ambulatory. If a wheelchair is used part-time, it must be used for less than 50% of the time
  • Positive assessment for Questionnaire Used to Identify Freezing of Gait in PD Patients at subject's best "on"

Exclusion Criteria

  • Presence of atypical features suggestive of MSA, PSP, ataxia, unexplained or prominent pyramidal signs, and/or autonomic dysfunction
  • Subjects who are non-ambulatory more than 50% of the time
  • Subjects who have had a history of syncope in the 6 months prior to screening
  • Subjects with moderate or advanced dementia
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00320242). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search