Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=1,189 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

A Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Compare the Efficacy of Treatment With Denosumab Versus Alendronate Sodium in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Density.

Osteoporosis · Osteopenia

Enrolled (actual)
1,189
Serious AEs
6.0%
Results posted
Jul 2010
Primary outcome: Primary: Total Hip Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12 — 2.6; 3.5 Percent Change from Baseline — p=<0.0001

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Alendronate (Drug); Denosumab (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
Amgen
Primary completion
Nov 2007

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Total Hip Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12
2.6; 3.5 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12
4.2; 5.3 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Trochanter Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12
3.4; 4.5 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12
1.8; 2.4 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Distal 1/3 Radius Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12
0.6; 1.1 0.0001 sig

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density, the mean percent change in total hip BMD in subjects receiving denosumab is not less than that observed in subjects receiving alendronate sodium by more than a pre-specified non-inferiority margin.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria: - Patient is an ambulatory postmenopausal woman - Patient has BMD value that corresponds to a T-score of less than or equal to -2.0 (g/cm2) at the lumbar spine OR total hip within range specific to the study protocol. Exclusion Criteria: o Any disorder that compromises the ability of the subject to give written informed consent and/or to comply with study procedures

  • Evidence of any of the following per subject report, chart review or central laboratory result:
  • Hyper- or hypothyroidism; however, subjects on stable thyroid hormone replacement therapy may be allowed per the following criteria:
  • If TSH level is normal, subject is eligible for the study.
  • If TSH level is below normal range, subject is not eligible for the study.
  • If TSH level is elevated (> 5.5 mIU/mL to 10.0 mIU/mL), serum T4 should be measured. If serum T4 is within normal range, subject is eligible. If serum T4 is outside of normal range, subject is not eligible for the study.
  • If TSH level is above 10.0 mIU/mL, subject is not eligible.
  • Current hyper- or hypoparathyroidism
  • Elevated transaminases
  • Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST; serum glutamate-oxaloacetic transaminase [SGOT]) ³ 2.0 x upper limits of normal (ULN)
  • Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT; serum glutamate-pyruvate transaminase [SGPT]) ³ 2.0 x ULN
  • Significantly impaired renal function as determined by serum creatinine ³ 2.0 mg/dL
  • Current hypo- or hypercalcemia based on the central laboratory reference ranges
  • Active gastric or duodenal ulcer; history of significant gastrointestinal bleed requiring hospitalization or transfusion, or dyspepsia or gastroesophageal reflux disease that is uncontrolled by medication
  • Rheumatoid Arthritis, Paget's disease, Cushing's disease, hyperprolactinemia, or cirrhosis of the liver
  • Known to have tested positive for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, or hepatitis B surface antigen
  • Malignancy (except fully resected cutaneous basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma, cervical or breast ductal carcinoma in situ) within the last 5 years
  • Any metabolic bone disease, eg, osteomalacia or osteogenesis imperfecta, which may interfere with the interpretation of the findings
  • Malabsorption syndrome or any gastrointestinal disorders that are associated with malabsorption
  • Received any solid organ or bone marrow transplant
  • Vitamin D deficiency (25(OH) vitamin D level < 12 ng/mL). Vitamin D repletion will be permitted and subjects may be re-screened; see Section 7.
  • Any laboratory abnormality which, in the opinion of the investigator, will prevent the subject from completing the study or interfere with the interpretation of the study results
  • Contraindicated or poorly tolerant of ALN therapy; contraindications for ALN therapy include:
  • Abnormalities of the esophagus, which delay esophageal emptying such as stricture or achalasia.
  • Inability to stand or sit upright for at least 30 minutes.
  • Hypersensitivity to ALN or other constituents of ALN tablets o Known sensitivity to mammalian cell derived drug products
  • Known intolerance to calcium supplements
  • Administration of intravenous bisphosphonate, or fluoride (except for dental treatment) or strontium ranelate
  • Oral bisphosphonate treatment:
  • ³ 3 months cumulatively in the past 2 years, OR
  • ³ 1 month in the past year, OR
  • Any use during the 3-month period prior to randomization
  • PTH or PTH derivatives (eg, teriparatide) within the last year
  • Administration of any of the following treatments within 3 months of randomization:
  • Any SERM (eg, raloxifene)
  • Tibolone
  • Anabolic steroids or testosterone
  • Glucocorticosteroids (³ 5 mg prednisone equivalent per day for more than 10 days)
  • Systemic (oral, transdermal, topical) hormone replacement therapy (local vaginal estrogen preparation will be allowed)
  • Calcitonin
  • Calcitriol or vitamin D derivatives
  • Other bone active drugs including anti-convulsives (except benzodiazepines) and
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00330460). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search