Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=956 Randomized Triple-blind Treatment

Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant Compared to Sham Injection in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00344968 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
956
Serious AEs
77.1%
Results posted
May 2014
Primary outcomePrimary: Visual Acuity — 18.9; 28.7; 27.8 percentage of subjects

Summary

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of an intravitreal insert of fluocinolone acetonide for the treatment of diabetic macular edema.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Visual Acuity
18.9; 28.7; 27.8
SECONDARY
Retinal Thickness
146.1; 113.5; 131.8

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age >= 18 years with diabetic macular edema
  • Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus types 1 or 2
  • Best corrected visual acuity of 19-68 letters
  • Retinal thickness > 250 micron by OCT
  • Investigator is comfortable deferring macular laser treatment for 6 weeks

Exclusion Criteria

  • Glaucoma, ocular hypertension, IOP >21 mmHg or concurrent therapy at screening with IOP lowering agents
  • Retinal or choroidal neovascularization due to ocular conditions other than diabetic retinopathy
  • Prior intravitreal, subtenon, or periocular steroid therapy within 6 months
  • Any ocular surgery within the last 3 months
  • Retinal laser treatment within the last 3 months
  • History of uncontrolled IOP elevation with steroid use that did not respond to topical therapy
  • Any lens opacity which impairs visualization of the posterior pole
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00344968). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search