Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=1,468 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

Rosiglitazone (Extended Release Tablets) As Adjunctive Therapy In Subjects With Mild To Moderate Alzheimer's Disease

Alzheimer's Disease

Enrolled (actual)
1,468
Serious AEs
12.5%
Results posted
Sep 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Total Score at Week 48, as a Function of APOE ε4 Status in APOE4 Negatives Cohort — 3.2; 3.5; 4.0 Scores on a scale — p=0.739

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Rosiglitazone Extended Release 2mg (Drug); Rosiglitazone Extended Release 8mg (Drug); Placebo (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 50+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Primary completion
Mar 2009

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Total Score at Week 48, as a Function of APOE ε4 Status in APOE4 Negatives Cohort
3.2; 3.5; 4.0 0.739
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Total Score at Week 48, as a Function of APOE ε4 Status in All Except E4/E4s Cohort
3.8; 3.6; 3.8 0.783
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Total Score at Week 48, as a Function of APOE ε4 Status in Full Population Cohort
3.9; 3.8; 3.8 =0.763
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score at Week 48, as a Function of APOE ε4 Status in APOE4 Negatives Cohort
1.8; 1.7; 1.7 0.611
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline in CDR-SB Score at Week 48, as a Function of APOE ε4 Status in All Except E4/E4s Cohort
1.8; 1.8; 1.7 0.913
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline in CDR-SB Score at Week 48, as a Function of APOE ε4 Status in Full Population Cohort
1.9; 1.8; 1.8 0.557
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Total Score at Weeks 8, 16, 24 and 36
0.1; 0.2; 0.3; 0.2; 0.3; 0.2 0.633
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in CDR-SB Score at Weeks 12, 24 and 36
0.3; 0.4; 0.3; 0.9; 0.8; 0.9 0.938
SECONDARY
Change From Screening in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score
-2.0; -2.3; -2.0 0.386
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) Total Score
-2.3; -1.2; -2.3; -3.0; -2.3; -3.9 0.090
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score
-0.0; -0.3; -0.2; 0.1; 0.2; 0.1 0.583
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Domains of the Resource Utilization in Dementia Scale (RUD)- Q1 and Q2 Caregiver Hours
-2.4; 1.8; 3.5; 7.4; 9.0; 10.9 0.251
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life -5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Scale Total Score- Thermometer Score
2.4; -0.0; 0.1; 1.7; 1.3; -0.4 0.043 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Scale Total Score- Utility Score
-0.02; -0.01; -0.03; -0.03; -0.03; -0.06 0.662
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Carer's Quality of Life Instrument (ACQLI) Score
0.3; 0.1; 0.2; 1.2; 0.8; 1.4 0.529
SECONDARY
Change in ADAS-Cog Total Score for Observed Cases at Week 54 Compared to Week 48
1.0; 0.4; 0.5 0.106
SECONDARY
Change in CDR-SB Total Score for Observed Cases at Week 54 Compared to Week 48
0.3; 0.2; 0.3 0.324
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 48
0.13; 0.18; 0.26 0.038 sig
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With On-treatment Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Severity of AEs
275; 298; 319; 60; 58; 66
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Clinical Concern at Any Time on Treatment- Weight
33; 31; 47; 28; 32; 23
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Clinical Concern at Any Time on Treatment- Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
67; 72; 86; 1; 3; 3
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Clinical Concern at Any Time on Treatment- Heart Rate (HR)
12; 5; 5; 0; 0; 4
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Weight
-0.1; 0.1; 0.5; 0.1; 0.2; 0.9
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin
-0.5; -2.9; -3.9; -0.6; -6.1; -11.2
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit
-0.0020; -0.0088; -0.0121; -0.0018; -0.0166; -0.0320
SECONDARY
Any Time on Treatment Differences in Frequencies of Hematology Data Outside the Reference Range
3; 1; 1; 3; 3; 6
SECONDARY
Any Time on Treatment Differences in Frequencies of Clinical Chemistry Data Outside the Reference Range
2; 1; 1; 2; 2; 0
SECONDARY
Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- HR
-1.6; -1.1; -1.8; -1.4; -0.5; -1.0
SECONDARY
Changes From Baseline in ECG Parameters- RR Interval, QT Interval, QTcB, QTcF, PR Interval and QRS Duration
26.7; 17.9; 30.4; 23.8; 11.0; 17.7
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in HbA1c up to Week 54
0.02; 0.13; 0.15; 0.09; 0.17; 0.17
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Short Term Memory Assessment
-0.2; -0.2; -0.1; -0.3; -0.4; -0.5 0.748

Summary

Rosiglitazone (RSG) has been tested in clinical studies and is approved by the FDA as a treatment for type II diabetes mellitus, a disease that occurs when the body is unable to effectively use glucose. RSG XR, the investigational drug used in this study, is an extended-release form of RSG. This study tests whether RSG XR safely provides clinical benefit to people with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) when combined with one of the currently approved AD medications, Aricept®, Razadyne® or Exelon®. RSG XR is a new approach to AD therapy and this study tests a new way to treat AD by testing whether one's genetic makeup affects the response to the study drug. Clinical data suggesting that RSG may benefit AD patients was first seen in a small study performed at the University of Washington and then from a larger GSK study conducted in Europe and New Zealand. In the first study, subjects receiving RSG once daily for 6 months scored significantly better on 3 tests of memory and thought than those who did not receive RSG. In the GSK study, those that appeared to benefit most from treatment with RSG XR had a specific genetic pattern. They did not have the gene that caused them to produce the protein apolipoprotein E e4 (APOE e4). Subjects who have the APOE e4 gene may have two copies, one from each parent, or they may have only one APOE e4 gene meaning that they inherited either the APOE e2 or APOE e3 version of the gene, instead of APOE e4, from one of their parents. Subjects with one copy of the APOE e4 gene remained at their same level of thinking ability while those with two copies of the APOE e4 gene, continued to worsen during the 6-month treatment. The current study will more directly test the effectiveness or RSG XR on people who either have or lack the APOE e4 gene.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

A subject will be eligible for inclusion in this study only if all of the following criteria apply:

  • Male or female subject with a clinical diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease in accordance with NINCDS-ADRDA criteria (Appendix 2).

(Note: National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke (NINCDS) and Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (ADRDA).)

  • Subject has mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease as defined by a MMSE score 10 to 26 inclusive at Screening.
  • Hachinski Ischemia Score ≤ 4 at Screening (See Appendix 3).
  • Age ≥50 and ≤90 years.
  • At least 6 months of ongoing acetylcholinesterase inhibitor therapy for Alzheimer's disease, with stable dosing for at least the last 2 months (and with no intent to change for the duration of the study).
  • Current use of medication is in accordance with the criteria listed in Table 2 (Permitted Medications, Section 8.1).
  • Female subjects must be post-menopausal (i.e. >1 year without menstrual period), surgically sterile, or agree to use adequate method of contraception (Appendix 4) for the duration of the study. Female subjects who are pre-menopausal or who have been post-menopausal for 7, the Investigator should decide if the subject has depression in need of prescribed medication, and a CSDD >12 is considered a strong indicator that treatment is needed. Subjects will be allowed to re-screen after their depression has been adequately managed for >3 months.)
  • History or presence of gastro-intestinal, hepatic, or renal disease or other condition known to interfere with the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of drugs, or any other clinically relevant abnormality, medical or psychiatric condition, which, in the opinion of the Investigator, makes the subject unsuitable for inclusion in the study.
  • Clinically significant peripheral edema at the time of screening.
  • Current or recent drug or alcohol abuse or dependence (defined by DSM-IV criteria for substance-related disorders), or recent or remote history of the same if that could be a contributing factor to the dementia.
  • Systolic blood pressure >165 or 95 or 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN)).
  • ALT, AST, or alkaline phosphatase values >2.5 times the ULN, total bilirubin values >1.5 times the ULN, or history of severe hepatobiliary disease (e.g. hepatitis B or C, or cirrhosis, Child-Pugh Class B/C).

(Note: For subjects with a diagnosis of Gilberts Syndrome and an isolated increase in total bilirubin >1.5 ULN, fractionation should be performed. If all of the following conditions are met, the patient may enter or remain in the study, even if total bilirubin >1.5 ULN:

  • an elevated unconjugated (indirect) bilirubin;
  • the percentage of direct bilirubin <35%;
  • ALT, AST, and alkaline phosphatase <2.5 ULN if subject is in screening (<2.0 ULN for Canadian subjects only), or ≤3 ULN if subject is already randomized into the study)
  • History of a bone marrow transplant.
  • Subject is unable (with assistance, if appropriate) to take study medication as prescribed throughout the study or is at risk of non-compliance with study medication or procedures.
  • Subject is an immediate family member or employee of the participating Investigator, of any of the participating site staff, or of GSK.
  • In France, a subject is neither affiliated with nor a beneficiary of a social security category.
  • The French subject has participated in any study using an investigational drug during the previous 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer).
  • Cognitive tasks prescribed for cognitive rehabilitation and performed under medical supervision are prohibited for 6 months prior to Screening, as well as for the duration of the study.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00348140). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search