Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=1,240 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

Efficacy Trial Comparing ZD6474 With Erlotinib in NSCLC After Failure of at Least One Prior Chemotherapy

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00364351 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
1,240
Serious AEs
28.5%
Results posted
May 2011
Primary outcomePrimary: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) — 11.3; 8.9 Weeks

Summary

To determine if ZD6474 a new investigational drug, is effective in treating Non Small Lung Cancer and if so, how it compares with another type of anti cancer therapy chemotherapy, Erlotinib

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
11.3; 8.9
SECONDARY
Overall Survival (OS)
6.9; 7.8
SECONDARY
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
75; 74
SECONDARY
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
254; 242
SECONDARY
Time to Deterioration of Disease-related Symptoms (TDS) by EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - Pain
11.1; 9.9
SECONDARY
Time to Deterioration of Disease-related Symptoms (TDS) by EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - Dyspnoea
12; 12.4
SECONDARY
Time to Deterioration of Disease-related Symptoms (TDS) by EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - Cough
15.6; 14.1

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Confirmed locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC
  • Failure of at least one but not more than two prior chemotherapy regimens

Exclusion Criteria

  • Prior treatment with erlotinib (Tarceva), gefitinib (IRESSA), sunitinib (Sutent), sorafenib (Nexavar)
  • Chemotherapy or other type of anti cancer therapy within 4 weeks of study start
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00364351). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search