Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=1,061 Randomized Triple-blind Treatment

Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of a Once-daily Dose of Tigecycline vs Ertapenem in Diabetic Foot Infections (DFI) With a Substudy in Patients With Diabetic Foot Infections Complicated by Osteomyelitis.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00366249 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
1,061
Serious AEs
Results posted
Aug 2009
Primary outcomePrimary: Number of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure. — 316; 334; 92; 71 patients

Summary

The purpose of this study was to look at the safety and effectiveness of a once-daily dose of tigecycline compared to ertapenem for the treatment of diabetic foot infections. The co-primary efficacy endpoints were not met.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure.
316; 334; 92; 71
PRIMARY
Number of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure/Indeterminate.
340; 363; 117; 86; 19; 17
SECONDARY
Number of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure Assessed at Least 25 - 27 Weeks Post Last Dose.
12; 13; 26; 11
SECONDARY
Number of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure/Indeterminate Assessed at Least 25 - 27 Weeks Post Last Dose.
19; 21; 27; 12; 7; 0
SECONDARY
Number of Patients With Microbiologic Response of Eradication.
209; 229

Eligibility Criteria

Main inclusion criteria:

  • Men and women aged 18 or older with diabetes and a qualifying foot infection. People with evidence of a diabetic foot infection with osteomyelitis may qualify for the osteomyelitis substudy arm.

Main exclusion criteria:

  • People with additional significant disease, infection with resistant pathogens, contraindication, or hypersensitivity to any test article or related antibiotic.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00366249). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search