N/A
N=69
Assessment of Two Postoperative Techniques Used to Predict Voiding Efficiency After Gynecologic Surgery
Urinary Incontinence
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00392210 ↗Enrolled (actual)
69
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Apr 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants Who Passed Bladder Trial — 25; 39 participants
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Voiding Trial (Genetic)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- Female
- Sponsor
- University of Rochester
- Primary completion
- Oct 2009
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Number of Participants Who Passed Bladder Trial |
25; 39 | — |
Summary
After gynecologic surgery, it may be difficult to void (urinate). This problem is usually short-term with normal function returning within a few days to a few weeks. For this reason, patients may require drainage of their bladder with a catheter immediately after surgery. Currently in our office, we use two different tests to see how well you are able to urinate and how quickly the catheter can be removed. The purpose of this study is to see which voiding test is better after gynecologic surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- All women > 18 years of age presenting to the Division of Urogynecology at the University of Rochester Medical Center/Strong Memorial Hospital and undergoing gynecologic surgery which requires postoperative placement of a transurethral catheter.
- Subjects must be competent to give informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
- Any patient less than 18 years of age.
- Patients with suprapubic catheters postoperatively.
- Patients undergoing surgery that does not require transurethral catheterization postoperatively.
- Patients not competent to give informed consent.
- Patients who are pregnant.
- Patients undergoing procedures requiring prolonged bladder decompression (i.e. fistula repair).
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00392210). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.