Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=352 Randomized Treatment

Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Iron Versus Oral Iron in Subjects Who Display Postpartum Anemia

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00396292 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
352
Serious AEs
2.3%
Results posted
Dec 2013
Primary outcomePrimary: Number of Subjects Who Achieved 'Success' Meaning a ≥ 2.0 Increase in Hemoglobin — 162; 159 participants

Summary

This study compares the safety and efficacy of intravenous iron vs oral iron in subjects who display postpartum anemia.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Subjects Who Achieved 'Success' Meaning a ≥ 2.0 Increase in Hemoglobin
162; 159

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Female Subjects able to give consent
  • Post partum patients
  • Baseline Hbg< /= 10
  • Agree to practice birth control
  • Demonstrate willingness to comply with protocol restrictions

Exclusion Criteria

  • Known hypersensitivity reaction to oral or IV iron (VIT-45)
  • Documented history of discontinuing oral iron
  • Significant bleeding
  • History of anemia other that iron deficiency anemia
  • Severe Psychiatric disorders
  • Active severe infection
  • Known Hepatitis B antigen or Hep C viral antibody or active hepatitis
  • Known HIV antibody
  • Received investigational product within 30 days
  • Alcohol abuse
  • Hemochromatosis or other iron storage disorder
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00396292). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search