Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 N=52 Treatment

Efficacy and Safety of Sunitinib in Metastatic Gastric Cancer

Gastric Adenocarcinoma · Barrett Esophagus

Enrolled (actual)
52
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jan 2011
Primary outcome: Primary: Objective Response Rate (ORR) — 3.92 Participants (%)

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Interventions
Sunitinib-Malate (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
Primary completion
Jul 2009

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
3.92
SECONDARY
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
39
SECONDARY
Overall Survival (OS)
177
SECONDARY
One-Year Survival
23.7
SECONDARY
Adverse Events
52
SECONDARY
Safety and Tolerability: Serious Adverse Events
26
SECONDARY
Safety and Tolerability: Adverse Events in ≥10% of Patients
19; 16; 9; 9; 8; 8

Summary

This trial will be conducted to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of sunitinib (sunitinib-malate) as a second-line palliative therapy in metastatic gastric cancer. Despite the efforts in front-line therapy, second-line protocols have not yet been established in randomized clinical trials for those patients. Although many patients are still in good performance status and present with low tumor burden after failure of first-line chemotherapy, they may clearly benefit from second-line treatment. Increasingly more metachronic metastatic patients are urging for new platinum-free therapeutic options due to the fast-growing use of (neo-) adjuvant platin-based protocols. So far, only sparse data on chemotherapy are available after failure of platin-based protocols. Nearly only irinotecan-containing combinations have properly been analyzed, and produced excellent response rates and survival times of up to 30% and 7.6 months, respectively. However, irinotecan has not been approved yet for this indication. In addition, as irinotecan-containing regimens have been submitted for approval for first-line therapy, second-line regimens in irinotecan-refractory patients have not been evaluated in any trial. Thus, there is an urgent need to establish new second-line treatment options for both, cisplatinum- or irinotecan-combination refractory patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. Sunitinib inhibits the receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) involved in tumor proliferation and angiogenesis, specifically the VEGFR, PDGFR, KIT, FLT-3, and RET. The VEGF pathway has been shown to be a significant factor in metastatic gastric cancer. In gastric carcinoma cells, VEGF ligands and its receptors are definitely involved in the process of tumor progression. KDR and FLT-1 are expressed widely and VEGF stimulated KDR-positive tumor cell growth directly. The ligand VEGF-C has also been shown to be involved in progression of human gastric carcinoma, particularly via lymphangiogenesis. In addition, peritoneal metastases of some cancers such as gastric cancers were largely dependent on VEGF. Therefore, patients with chemo-refractory metastatic gastric cancer might benefit from VEGFR inhibitory therapy with sunitinib.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Signed and dated informed consent of the patient before the start of specific protocol procedures
  • Histologically proven adenocarcinoma of stomach, esophagogastric junction or lower esophagus (Barrett carcinoma)
  • Measurable metastatic disease according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). If locally recurrent disease, it must be associated with at least one measurable lymph node (> 20 mm by computed tomography [CT] scan or > 10 mm with spiral CT).
  • Failure of prior palliative chemotherapy/chemotherapies (at least one irinotecan- or cisplatin-based). Failure is defined either by progression of disease or by significant toxicity that precludes further treatment.
  • At least 3 weeks from previous chemotherapy at first dose of trial drug
  • Resolution of all acute toxic side effects of prior therapy or surgical procedures to grade ≤ 1 National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) (except for the laboratory values)
  • Adequate organ function as defined by the following criteria:
  • Serum aspartate transaminase (AST; serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase [SGOT]) and serum alanine transaminase (ALT; serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase [SGPT]) ≤ 2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN), or AST and ALT ≤ 5 x ULN if liver function abnormalities are due to underlying malignancy
  • Total serum bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN
  • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1500/microL
  • Platelets ≥ 100,000/microL
  • Hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dL without support of growth factors (previous administration of erythrocyte concentrate is allowed)
  • Serum calcium ≤ 12.0 mg/dL
  • Serum creatinine ≤ 2.0 x ULN
  • Lipase/amylase ≤ 2.5 x ULN
  • All other laboratory values specified in the protocol (white blood cell count, white blood cell differential, alkaline phosphatase, sodium, potassium, creatinine clearance): resolution of all side effects of prior therapy or surgical procedure to grade 12 weeks
  • Patients must be able to swallow sunitinib capsules
  • Patients who understand the nature of the trial and are willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plans, laboratory tests and other trial procedures
  • Female patients who are capable of bearing children must have a negative pregnancy test result (serum or urine) at trial entry. All women included in the trial must be surgically sterile or postmenopausal or agree to employ adequate birth control measures for the duration of the trial and six months post-dosing. Male patients must be surgically sterile or must agree to use effective contraception during the trial and six months post-dosing.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Tumor type other than adenocarcinoma (e.g., leiomyosarcoma, lymphoma) or a second cancer except in patients with squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin or carcinoma in situ of the cervix which has been effectively treated. Patients curatively treated and disease free for at least 5 years will be discussed with the sponsor before inclusion.
  • Patients with known brain or leptomeningeal metastasis
  • Intake of non-permitted concomitant drugs. (The coordinating investigator should be contacted to discuss the individual case.)
  • Concomitant treatment with antiarrhythmics and drugs with dysrhythmic potential (i.e., terfenadine, quinidine, procainamide, disopyramide, sotalol, probucol, bepridil, haloperidol, risperidone, and indapamide)
  • Administration of potent CYP34A inhibitors during or within 7 days before start of sunitinib-treatment (e.g. ketoconazole, itraconazole, clarithromycin, erythromycin, diltiazem, verapamil, delavirdine, indinavir, saquinavir, ritonavir, atazanavir, nelfinavir, grapefruit juice)
  • Administration of potent CYP3A4 inducers during or within 12 days before start of sunitinib-treatment (e.g. dexamethasone, rifampicin, rifabutin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, St. John´s wort, efavirenz, tipranavir)
  • Ongoing treatment with therapeutic doses of anticoagulants such as Coumadin or heparins. (However, low dose Coumadi
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00411151). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search