Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=1,272 Randomized Triple-blind Treatment

Pyronaridine Artesunate (3:1) Versus Coartem® in P Falciparum Malaria Patients

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00422084 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
1,272
Serious AEs
0.4%
Results posted
Sep 2021
Primary outcomePrimary: PCR-Corrected Adequate Clinical and Parasitological Response (ACPR) Rate on Day 28 — 99.5; 99.2 percentage of subjects — p=0.578
◆ Published Evidence
Highly cited
143citations · ~9 / year
Efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose oral combination of pyronaridine-artesunate compared with artemether-lumefantrine in children and adults with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria: a randomised non-inferiority trial.
Lancet (London, England) · 2010 · High-confidence link

Summary

The primary objective of this phase III study is to compare the efficacy and safety of the fixed combination of pyronaridine artesunate (Pyramax®, PA) with that of Coartem® (artemether lumefantrine, AL) in children and adults with uncomplicated P falciparum malaria in Africa and South East Asia.

Linked Publications (4)

  • Efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose oral combination of pyronaridine-artesunate compared with artemether-lumefantrine in children and adults with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria: a randomised non-inferiority trial.
    Lancet (London, England) · 2010 · 143 citations · High-confidence link
  • Safety and efficacy of pyronaridine-artesunate in uncomplicated acute malaria: an integrated analysis of individual patient data from six randomized clinical trials.
    Malaria journal · 2013 · 90 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Population Pharmacokinetics of Pyronaridine in Pediatric Malaria Patients.
    Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2015 · 36 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Pyronaridine-artesunate for treating uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022 · 20 citations · Open access · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
PCR-Corrected Adequate Clinical and Parasitological Response (ACPR) Rate on Day 28
99.5; 99.2 0.578
SECONDARY
PCR-corrected Adequate Clinical and Parasitological Response (ACPR) on Day 14
99.9; 100
SECONDARY
Crude ACPR (Non-PCR Corrected ACPR) on Day 14 and Day 28
100; 100; 98.9; 97.2
SECONDARY
Parasite Clearance Time
23.9; 24.0
SECONDARY
Fever Clearance Time
7.9; 8.0
SECONDARY
Percentage of Patients With Fever Clearance at Day 1, 2 and 3
88.7; 87.0; 99.0; 98.7; 99.5; 99.3
SECONDARY
Proportion of Patients With Parasite Clearance at Day 1, 2 and 3
68.1; 52.8; 98.1; 97.2; 99.5; 99.7
SECONDARY
Adverse Events and Clinically Significant Laboratory Results
509; 241; 275; 123; 3; 2

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Male or female patients between the age of 3 and 60 years, inclusive.
  • Body weight between 20 kg and 90 kg with no clinical evidence of severe malnutrition.
  • Presence of acute uncomplicated P. falciparum mono-infection confirmed by:
  • Fever, as defined by axillary/tympanic temperature ≥ 37.5°C or oral/rectal temperature ≥ 38°C, or documented history of fever in the previous 24 hours and,
  • Positive microscopy of P. falciparum with parasite density between 1,000 and 100,000 asexual parasite count/μl of blood.
  • Written informed consent, in accordance with local practice, provided by patient and/or parent/guardian/spouse.
  • Ability to swallow oral medication.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients with signs and symptoms of severe/complicated malaria requiring parenteral treatment according to the World Health Organization Criteria 2000.
  • Mixed Plasmodium infection.
  • Severe vomiting or severe diarrhoea.
  • Known history or evidence of clinically significant disorders.
  • Presence of significant anaemia, as defined by Hb 2.5 times the upper limit of normal range.
  • Known significant renal impairment as indicated by serum creatinine >1.4 mg/dL.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00422084) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search