Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=2,428 Randomized Double-blind Prevention

Safety and Efficacy of HEPLISAV™ Hepatitis B Virus Vaccine Compared With Engerix-B® Vaccine

Hepatitis B

Enrolled (actual)
2,428
Serious AEs
1.7%
Results posted
Feb 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: Percentage of Subjects With Seroprotective Immune Response — 95.1; 81.3 Percentage of Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
HEPLISAV and/or Placebo (Biological); Engerix-B (Biological)
Age
Pediatric, Adult · 11+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Dynavax Technologies Corporation
Primary completion
Feb 2008

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Subjects With Seroprotective Immune Response
95.1; 81.3
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Local and Systemic Reactions to Injections
40.4; 34.1; 35.8; 24.8; 6.5; 20.5

Summary

The purpose of this study is to find out if a new investigational hepatitis B virus vaccine, HEPLISAV™, is safe and effective compared with Engerix-B® vaccine in subjects 11-55 years old. The primary hypothesis is that the seroprotective immune response of HEPLISAV™ is at least as good as that of Engerix-B®.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Willing and able to give written informed consent
  • Is serum negative for HBV antibodies

Exclusion Criteria

  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Any previous HBV infection
  • Previous vaccination with any HBV vaccine (1 or more doses)
  • Any autoimmune disease
  • Received any blood products or antibodies within 3 months prior to study entry
  • Ever received an injection with DNA plasmids or oligonucleotides
  • Received any vaccines within 4 weeks prior to study entry
  • Received any other investigational medicinal agent within 4 weeks prior to study entry
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00435812). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search