Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=56 Randomized Triple-blind Treatment

Evaluation of Adherence and Therapeutic Effectiveness of Bi-Flex Versus CPAP in Children With OSA

Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Enrolled (actual)
56
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Apr 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Minutes of Use Per Night at Month 1 — 185; 201 minutes — p=0.512

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Bi-Flex (Device); CPAP (Device)
Age
Pediatric · 2+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Primary completion
Apr 2012

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Minutes of Use Per Night at Month 1
185; 201 0.512
PRIMARY
Minutes of Use Per Night at Month 3
183; 125 >0.05
PRIMARY
Change in Minutes of Use Per Night From Month 1 to Month 3
-11.1; -76.2 >0.05
SECONDARY
Drop Out Rate
1; 1 >0.05
SECONDARY
Change in Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI; Number of Apneas and Hypopneas Per Hour of Sleep) From Month 1 to Month 3
-8.8; -13.7 >0.05
SECONDARY
Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) 18 Score
SECONDARY
Change in ESS From Month 1 to Month 3
-4.5; -2.3 >0.05
SECONDARY
Change in NOSE Scale Score From Month 1 to Month 3
-1.6; -5.7 >0.05
SECONDARY
Pediatric Quality of Life (PedQL)

Summary

Context: The obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), i.e., snoring with difficulty breathing during sleep, is common in children. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy is the usual treatment for children who do not improve following surgery. However, CPAP is uncomfortable and is often not tolerated. We therefore plan to study a modification of bilevel positive airway pressure therapy, BiPAP with Bi-Flex that may be more comfortable. Objectives: The primary objective of this study is to determine whether BiPAP with Bi-Flex results in improvement in adherence as compared to CPAP. The secondary objective is to determine whether Bi-Flex has similar therapeutic efficacy compared to CPAP, as determined by sleep study. Additional objectives include comparing CPAP and Bi-Flex effects on comfort and determining which parameters predict adherence. Study Design/Setting/Participants: A single center, randomized controlled double-blind study of Bi-Flex vs CPAP use in children with OSAS over a 3 month period. Intervention: Bi-Flex vs CPAP Study Measures: Objective compliance recordings, sleep study results, subjective questionnaire results. .

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Males or females aged 2 to 16 years.
  • OSAS diagnosed on polysomnography.
  • Positive airway pressure therapy indicated by patient's physician because surgery was either contraindicated or ineffective.
  • No plans for upper airway surgery in the next 3 months.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Age less than 2 years, as infants and toddlers have different pulmonary mechanics from older children, and may require intense behavioral modification programs prior to CPAP use.
  • Age greater or equal to 16 years, as results may be similar to adult studies in these older patients.
  • Previous use of CPAP / bilevel ventilation.
  • Unable to read / understand English. -
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00458406). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search