Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=20 Double-blind Treatment

Comparison of Functional Vision Provided by AMO Tecnis Z9000 and Alcon SA60AT Acrysof

Cataract

Enrolled (actual)
20
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Best Corrected logMAR Contrast Acuity at Photopic/Mesopic Condition — 0.34; 0.34 log MAR

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
aspherical intraocular lens (Device); spherical intraocular lens (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 45+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
National Taiwan University Hospital
Primary completion
Sep 2007

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Best Corrected logMAR Contrast Acuity at Photopic/Mesopic Condition
0.34; 0.34
PRIMARY
Best Corrected Contrast Sensitivity in Photopic Condition
47.03; 55.90; 82.64; 85.09; 69.31; 72.41
SECONDARY
Corneal High-order Aberrations
0.10; 0.11
SECONDARY
Total Ocular High-order Aberrations
0.6314; 0.0856

Summary

This study is to compare intraindividually the functional vision provided by two different posterior chamber intraocular lenses: AMO Tecnis Z9000 and Alcon SA60AT Acrysoft. To see if the aspherical intraocular lenses provide better functional vision than traditional spherical intraocular lenses.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Bilateral cataracts, eligible for phacoemulsification with primary implantation of a posterior chamber IOL
  • Willing and able to comply with scheduled visits and other study procedures

Exclusion Criteria

  • Preoperative ocular pathology potentially affect visual acuity. EX: diabetic retinopathy, macular degeneration, corneal opacity, glaucoma, visual field defect...etc.
  • Previous ocular surgery. Ex: refractive surgery, vitreoretinal surgery...etc.
  • Patients who cannot cooperative with the study procedures
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00459303). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search