Phase 4 Completed N=20 Double-blind Treatment

Comparison of Functional Vision Provided by AMO Tecnis Z9000 and Alcon SA60AT Acrysof

Cataract

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00459303 ↗

Enrolled (actual)

Serious AEs

0.0%

Results posted

Feb 2014

Primary outcomePrimary: Best Corrected logMAR Contrast Acuity at Photopic/Mesopic Condition — 0.34; 0.34 log MAR

Summary

This study is to compare intraindividually the functional vision provided by two different posterior chamber intraocular lenses: AMO Tecnis Z9000 and Alcon SA60AT Acrysoft. To see if the aspherical intraocular lenses provide better functional vision than traditional spherical intraocular lenses.

Outcome Measures

Outcome	Result	p-value
PRIMARY Best Corrected logMAR Contrast Acuity at Photopic/Mesopic Condition	0.34; 0.34	—
PRIMARY Best Corrected Contrast Sensitivity in Photopic Condition	47.03; 55.90; 82.64; 85.09; 69.31; 72.41	—
SECONDARY Corneal High-order Aberrations	0.10; 0.11	—
SECONDARY Total Ocular High-order Aberrations	0.6314; 0.0856	—

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Bilateral cataracts, eligible for phacoemulsification with primary implantation of a posterior chamber IOL
Willing and able to comply with scheduled visits and other study procedures

Exclusion Criteria

Preoperative ocular pathology potentially affect visual acuity. EX: diabetic retinopathy, macular degeneration, corneal opacity, glaucoma, visual field defect...etc.
Previous ocular surgery. Ex: refractive surgery, vitreoretinal surgery...etc.
Patients who cannot cooperative with the study procedures

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00459303). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.