Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=102 Randomized Treatment

Preservation and Expansion of T-cell Subsets Following HAART De-intensification to Atazanavir/Ritonavir (ATV/r)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00491556 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
102
Serious AEs
2.9%
Results posted
Jun 2016
Primary outcomePrimary: Difference in CD4+ T Cell Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48 — -10.08 percentage of CD4+ T cells — p=<0.0001

Summary

This study proposes to evaluate a pre-DHHS guideline of HAART initiation and then de-intensification management strategy in adolescents with mild immunosuppression and compare changes in CD4% from baseline to week 48 and then during de-intensification.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Difference in CD4+ T Cell Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48
-10.08 <0.0001 sig
PRIMARY
Difference in CD4+ T Cell Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152
-1.81 0.0834
SECONDARY
Difference in CD4+ T Cell Count Between Week 0 and Week 48
-317.36 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Difference in CD4+ T Cell Count Between Week 48 and Week 152
-24.20 0.6222
SECONDARY
Difference in CD4+ Naïve T Cell Count Between Week 0 and Week 48
-58.79 0.0781
SECONDARY
Difference in CD4+ Naïve T Cell Count Between Week 48 and Week 152
-103.53 0.0102 sig
SECONDARY
Difference in CD4+ Termed Central Memory (TCM) Count Between Week 0 and Week 48
-17.13 0.1616
SECONDARY
Difference in CD4+ TCM Count Between Week 48 and Week 152
-43.08 0.0117 sig
SECONDARY
Difference in CD4+ Effector Memory (TEM)Ro Count Between Week 0 and Week 48
-76.92 < 0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Difference in CD4+ TEMRo Count Between Week 48 and Week 152
16.87 0.2519
SECONDARY
Difference in CD4+ TEMRa Count Between Week 0 and Week 48
-126.79 < 0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Difference in CD4+ TEMRa Count Between Week 48 and Week 152
87.64 0.0003 sig
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8+ Naïve T-Cell Count Between Week 0 and Week 48
40.46 0.3739
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8+ Naïve T-Cell Count Between Week 48 and Week 152
-91.86 0.0147 sig
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8+ TCM Count Between Week 0 and Week 48
79.81 < 0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8+ TCM Count Between Week 48 and Week 152
-20.40 0.1067
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8+ TEMRo Count Between Week 0 and Week 48
90.82 0.0005 sig
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8+ TEMRo Count Between Week 48 and Week 152
33.49 0.0207 sig
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8+ TEMRa Count Between Week 0 and Week 48
-39.37 0.2082
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8+ TEMRa Count Between Week 48 and Week 152
48.27 0.0067 sig
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 Naïve CD28 Cell Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48
-18.07 < 0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 Naïve CD28 Cell Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152
1.66 0.5815
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 Naïve CD38 Cell Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48
11.24 < 0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 Naïve CD38 Cell Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152
-2.87 0.0594
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 Naïve CD57 Cell Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48
12.58 0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 Naïve CD57 Cell Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152
3.93 0.0995
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 Naïve T-Cell Percentage Expressing Human Leukocyte Antigen-D Related (HLA-DR) Between Week 0 and Week 48
1.95 0.0002 sig
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 Naïve T-Cell Percentage Expressing HLA-DR Between Week 48 and Week 152
0.03 0.9150
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 TCM CD28 Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48
-23.52 < 0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 TCM CD28 Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152
1.95 0.5864
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 TCM CD38 Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48
21.98 < 0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 TCM CD38 Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152
-2.20 0.1592
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 TCM CD57 Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48
4.97 0.0420 sig
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 TCM CD57 Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152
-2.20 0.4029
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 TCM HLA-DR Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48
14.60 < 0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 TCM HLA-DR Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152
-3.14 0.0239 sig
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 TEMRo CD28 Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48
-19.35 < 0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 TEMRo CD28 Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152
-3.45 0.2363
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 TEMRo CD38 Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48
19.69 < 0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 TEMRo CD38 Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152
-2.03 0.0929
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 TEMRo CD57 Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48
-2.53 0.1886
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 TEMRo CD57 Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152
1.87 0.2831
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 TEMRO HLADR Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48
11.52 < 0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 TEMRo HLA-DR Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152
-3.21 0.0157 sig
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 TEMRa CD28 Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48
-22.65 < 0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 TEMRa CD28 Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152
4.23 0.1999
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 TEMRa CD38 Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48
12.47 < 0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 TEMRa CD38 Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152
-1.95 0.0808
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 TEMRa CD57 Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48
11.70 0.0005 sig
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 TEMRa CD57 Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152
-0.30 0.9198
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 TEMRa HLA-DR Percentage Between Week 0 and Week 48
3.69 < 0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Difference in CD8 TEMRa HLA-DR Percentage Between Week 48 and Week 152
-1.31 0.0215 sig

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 18 yrs and 0 days to 24 yrs and 364 days;
  • CD4+ T cells > 350/mm3 and HIV RNA ≥ 1,000 copies/ml as determined by two consecutive measures within 6 months of entry with the second measure being collected at pre-entry;
  • Infected after age 9. HIV-1 infection should be documented by any licensed ELISA test kit and confirmed by Western blot, HIV-1 culture, HIV-1 antigen, plasma HIV-1 RNA, or a second antibody test by a method other than ELISA at any time prior to entry; Note: Subjects who are in acute seroconversion as evidenced by being ELISA negative (antibody negative) and DNA PCR or HIV-1 RNA positive or who are ELISA positive but Western Blot indeterminate are not eligible.
  • Subjects must be naïve to ARV medications except for women who have received HAART for prevention of maternal to child transmission (MTCT) that meet the following criteria: HAART (defined as three medications from two classes) given for no more than six months for prevention of MTCT, Evidence of viral suppression on the HAART regimen defined as a plasma RNA level below the level of detection for the assay used by the site either during the third trimester or around the time of delivery, A minimum of six months since HAART exposure for prevention of MTCT, and Exposure to HAART for a single pregnancy only; Note: Prior treatment with Trizivir for prevention of MCTC is also permitted as long as viral suppression is documented at the time of delivery or in the last trimester, whichever is most recent.
  • HIV genotype without major resistance mutations to ATV/r. The following genotypic mutations exclude subjects from participation in ATN 061: Major ATV mutations I50L; I84V; N88D/S, Major PI mutations including: D30N; V32I; L33I/F/V; M46I/L; I47V/A; G48V; I50V/L; I54V/L/A/M/T/S; L76V; V82A/F/T/S/L; L90M, Any major PI mutation as defined by the most current IAS-USA Drug Resistance Mutations Figures that would adversely affect a subject's future PI choices, Major RT mutations: Q151M and 69 insertion complex; Decisions regarding the selection of an NRTI backbone for subjects with NRTI resistance mutations other than those described above will be made by the site PI in consultation with the protocol chair or his designee. Whenever possible and not otherwise contraindicated, NRTI choices should be congruent with the protocol-specified preferred regimens. The site PI must provide a copy of the genotype analysis along with their proposed regimen for review; Note: Subjects who cannot go onto either FTC/TDF or AZT/3TC must have the regimen approved by the protocol team following pre-entry screening and prior to study entry. Note: All HIV-1 genotype profiles with ANY resistance mutations must be evaluated by a physician specializing in the care of HIV-infected patients prior to final determination of subject eligibility. Polymorphism mutations should NOT be reported since their clinical significance is unknown. All other (major and minor) mutations should be appropriately categorized and reported as indicated by the case report form. In circumstances where there are numerous such mutations or other concerns present, consultation with the protocol team by the evaluating physician via the ATN QNS is highly encouraged.
  • Calculated creatinine clearance ≥60 mL/min as estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault equation: For men, (140 - age in years) x (body weight in kg) ÷ (serum creatinine in mg/dL x 72) = CrCl (mL/min)*;*For women, multiply the result by 0.85 = CrCl (mL/min);
  • For females with child-bearing potential, agreement to use one effective birth control method and willing to postpone pregnancy for the duration of the study (See Section 9.3 - criteria for class C drugs should be followed); and
  • Able to provide written informed consent/assent.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Pregnancy;
  • On systemic immunosuppressive therapy or immune modulating therapy (short courses ( 3 seconds, QTc > 500 msec, and Cardiomyopathy;
  • Disallowed Medications (see S
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00491556). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search