Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 N=331 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Phase II Study for Previously Untreated Subjects With Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) or Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC)

Lung Cancer · Small Cell Lung Cancer · Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

Enrolled (actual)
331
Serious AEs
55.6%
Results posted
Jul 2012
Primary outcome: Primary: Immune-related Progression-free Survival (irPFS) in Participants With Nonsmall-cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Per Immune-related Response Criteria (irRC) — 5.52; 5.68; 4.63 Months — p=0.1302

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Interventions
Ipilimumab (Drug); Placebo (Drug); Paclitaxel (Drug); Carboplatin (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Primary completion
Oct 2009

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Immune-related Progression-free Survival (irPFS) in Participants With Nonsmall-cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Per Immune-related Response Criteria (irRC)
5.52; 5.68; 4.63 0.1302
SECONDARY
Progression-free Survival (PFS) in Participants With NSCLC Per Modified World Health Organization (mWHO) Criteria
4.11; 5.13; 4.21 0.2502
SECONDARY
Overall Survival in Participants With NSCLC
9.69; 12.22; 8.28 0.4759
SECONDARY
Best Overall Response Rate (BORR) Per mWHO Criteria in Participants With NSCLC and SCLC
21.4; 32.4; 13.6; 32.6; 57.1; 48.9
SECONDARY
Immune-related Best Overall Response Rate (irBORR) Per irRC in Participants With NSCLC and Small-cell Lung Cancer (SCLC)
21.4; 32.4; 18.2; 48.8; 71.4; 53.3
SECONDARY
Immune-related Disease Control Rate (irDCR) Per irRC and Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per mWHO Criteria in Participants With NSCLC and SCLC
70.0; 86.8; 81.8; 57.1; 77.9; 72.7
SECONDARY
Immune-related Duration of Response (irDoR) Per irRC and DoR Per mWHO Criteria in Participants With NSCLC and SCLC
6.70; 5.55; 4.01; 5.42; 5.55; 4.01
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With NSCLC Who Have Death as Outcome, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Drug-related SAEs, Adverse Events (AEs), AEs Leading to Discontinuation, and Drug-related AEs by Worst Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Grade
52; 50; 51; 11; 7; 8
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With NSCLC Who Have Abnormalities in On-study Hematology Laboratory Test Results by Worst CTC Grade
7.7; 6.2; 3.2; 90.8; 98.5; 90.2
SECONDARY
irPFS in Participants With SCLC Per irRC
5.68; 6.44; 5.26 0.1098
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With NSCLC Who Have Abnormalities in On-Study Liver Function Test Results By Worst CTC Grade
24; 15; 19; 2; 4; 3
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With NSCLC Who Had Abnormalities in Vital Sign Measurements and Physical Examination Findings
0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With NSCLC Who Have Abnormalities in Pancreatic Enzyme Clinical Laboratory Test Results by Worst CTC Grade
7.7; 6.2; 3.2; 1.5; 4.6; 1.6
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With NSCLC Who Have Positive Human Antihuman Antibody (HAHA) Status Postbaseline
2; 1
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With SCLC With Death as Outcome, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Drug-related SAEs, Adverse Events (AEs), AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Drug-related AEs by Worst CTC Grade
37; 31; 35; 6; 2; 1
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With SCLC Who Have Abnormalities in On-study Hematology Laboratory Test Results by Worst CTC Grade
7; 11; 13; 10; 9; 7
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With SCLC Who Have Abnormalities in Liver Function Test Results by Worst CTC Grade
12; 12; 8; 2; 3; 1
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With SCLC Who Have Abnormalities in Pancreatic Enzyme and Other Clinical Laboratory Test Results by Worst CTC Grade
7.7; 16.7; 11.6; 5.1; 4.8; 4.7
SECONDARY
Progression-free Survival (PFS) in Participants With SCLC Per mWHO Criteria
3.89; 5.22; 5.19 0.3846
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With SCLC Who Had Abnormalities in Vital Sign Measurements and Physical Examination Findings
0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With SCLC Who Have Positive HAHA Status Postbaseline
2; 3; 2; 0
SECONDARY
Overall Survival in Participants With SCLC
3.89; 5.22; 5.19 0.4132

Summary

The purpose of the study is to determine whether ipilimumab given with paclitaxel/carboplatin has clinical benefit when compared with paclitaxel/carboplatin alone in patients with previously untreated lung cancer.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed lung cancer (Stage IIIb/IV nonsmall-cell lung cancer or extensive stage small-cell lung cancer [SCLC])
  • Measurable tumor lesion (as long as it is not located in a previously irradiated area) as defined by modified World Health Organization criteria
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≤1 at study entry
  • Accessible for treatment and follow-up

Exclusion Criteria

  • Brain metastases
  • Malignant pleural effusion
  • Autoimmune disease
  • Motor neuropathy of autoimmune origin
  • SCLC-related paraneoplastic syndromes
  • Any concurrent malignancy other than nonmelanoma skin cancer; carcinoma in situ of the cervix or breast; or prostate cancer treated with systemic therapy (participants with a previous malignancy but without evidence of disease for 5 years were allowed to enter the study)
  • Prior systemic therapy for lung cancer. Prior radiation therapy or locoregional surgeries performed later than at least 3 weeks prior to randomization date were allowed.
  • Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy (motor or sensory)
  • Known HIV or hepatitis B or C infection
  • Chronic use of immunosuppressants and/or systemic corticosteroids (used in the management of cancer or noncancer-related illnesses). However, use of corticosteroids was allowed if used as premedication for paclitaxel infusion or for treating immune-related adverse events or adrenal insufficiencies.
  • Inadequate hematologic function defined by an absolute neutrophil count 2.0 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), or ≥2.5 times the ULN if liver metastases are present, aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels ≥2.5 times the ULN or ≥5 times the ULN if liver metastases are present.
  • Inadequate renal function defined by a serum creatinine level ≥2.5 times the ULN
  • Inadequate creatinine clearance defined as less than 50 mL/min.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00527735). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search