Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 N=21 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Treatments for Recovery of Hand Function in Acute Stroke Survivors

Stroke, Acute · Stroke · Hemiparesis · Hemiplegia

Enrolled (actual)
21
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jul 2013
Primary outcome: Primary: Maximum Voluntary Finger Extension Angle (a Measure of Hand Impairment) — -11.6; -43.4 degrees

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Interventions
Neuromuscular electrical stimulator (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
MetroHealth Medical Center
Primary completion
Apr 2010

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Maximum Voluntary Finger Extension Angle (a Measure of Hand Impairment)
-11.6; -43.4
SECONDARY
Finger Tracking Error
4.7; 8.3
SECONDARY
Box and Blocks Score
29.8; 22.9
SECONDARY
Arm Motor Abilities Test
3.54; 3.20
SECONDARY
Fugl-Meyer Assessment (Upper Extremity)
46.2; 41.1

Summary

Impaired hand function is one of the most frequently persisting consequences of stroke. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether two different types of treatment improve recovery of hand function after stroke.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 18 to 80
  • Within 6 months of first clinical hemorrhagic or nonhemorrhagic stroke
  • Cortical or subcortical stroke
  • Unilateral upper extremity hemiparesis with severe finger extensor and flexor paresis ( = 13 on Beck Depression Inventory Fast Screen)
  • Ipsilateral lower motor neuron lesion
  • Parkinson's Disease
  • Spinal cord injury
  • Traumatic brain injury
  • Multiple sclerosis
  • Lack of functional passive range of motion of the wrist or fingers of affected side
  • Severe shoulder or hand pain (unable to volitionally position hand in the workspace without pain)
  • Intramuscular botulinum toxin injections in upper extremity muscle in the last 3 months
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00565045). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search