Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=60 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Strategies for Aggressive Central Afterload Reduction in Patients With Heart Failure

Heart Failure

Enrolled (actual)
60
Serious AEs
9.8%
Results posted
May 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Change in Peak Oxygen Uptake (VO2) During Maximal Effort Exercise Stress Test According to Ejection Fraction Subgroups — 1.5; -0.5; 2.0; -1.0 percentage of change in Peak VO2 — p=<0.05

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
SphygmoCor (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Primary completion
Nov 2012

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change in Peak Oxygen Uptake (VO2) During Maximal Effort Exercise Stress Test According to Ejection Fraction Subgroups
1.5; -0.5; 2.0; -1.0 <0.05 sig
PRIMARY
Change in Aortic Augmentation Index (AIx) According to Ejection Fraction Subgroups
-6.9; -4.9; -8.3; -5.5
SECONDARY
Change in Heart Rate
3; -1 0.06
SECONDARY
Change in Left Ventricle (LV) End Diastolic Volume
-24; -17 0.5
SECONDARY
Change in LV End Systolic Volume
-18; -11 0.26
SECONDARY
Change in LV Ejection Fraction
2; -0.0 0.4
SECONDARY
Change in Stroke Volume
10; 10 0.9
SECONDARY
Change in Mitral E Velocity
5; 4 0.9
SECONDARY
Change in Mitral E/A Ratio
-0.1; -0.1 0.9
SECONDARY
Change in Mitral E Wave Deceleration Time
-25; -5 0.3
SECONDARY
Change in Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure (BP)
-9; -9 0.9
SECONDARY
Change in Brachial Diastolic BP
-2; -4 0.6
SECONDARY
Change in Central Systolic BP
-8; -9 0.9
SECONDARY
Change in Central Diastolic BP
-7; -3 0.11
SECONDARY
Change in Augmentation Index
-7; -5 0.4
SECONDARY
Change in Arterial Elastance
-0.3; -0.3 0.9

Summary

Heart failure (HF) is the leading cause of hospitalization among Americans over the age of 65 years, affecting greater than 5 million in the U.S. alone. Significant improvements in morbidity and mortality have been achieved through the use of medications that antagonize adverse neurohormonal signaling pathways, particularly therapies that reduce left ventricular (LV) afterload. Vascular stiffness increases with aging, contributing to the increase in cardiac load. One important repercussion of such stiffening is an increase in pulse wave velocity. As the incident pressure wave generated by cardiac ejection encounters zones of impedance mismatch (such as arterial bifurcations), part of the wave is reflected backward, summing with the incident wave, increasing central blood pressure (CBP). With normal aging, hypertension, and heart failure, increased wave velocity causes the reflected wave to reach the heart earlier, in mid to late systole, considerably increasing late-systolic load, impairing cardiac ejection, and diastolic relaxation in the ensuing cardiac cycle. The magnitude of this reflected pressure wave can be quantified by the augmentation index (AIx). The use of vasoactive agents which antagonize this increase in late systolic load (and AIx) may prove useful in the treatment of heart failure, by facilitating cardiac ejection during late systole when reflected pressure waves predominate. However, it has never been conclusively shown in humans that CBP-targeted therapy is useful in the management of HF. LV afterload, measured centrally in the ascending aorta, may differ considerably from brachial cuff-measured pressure, and has traditionally required invasive hemodynamic assessment to determine, limiting the applicability of techniques targeting CBP and late-systolic load. Recently, a novel, hand-held tonometer (SphygmoCor, Atcor Medical) has been developed for the noninvasive assessment of CBP. This pencil-like device is applied over the radial artery, and uses a validated mathematical transformation to derive central aortic pressure. This device has received FDA approval for clinical use in the assessment of central pressures. However, it remains unknown whether knowledge of CBP and late-systolic load (AIx) confers any clinically-significant incremental benefit in the management of patients with heart failure. The primary objective of the proposed investigation will be to determine if this assessment might have such a role.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • 18 years of age or greater
  • Cardiac Ejection Fraction (EF) greater than or equal to 25% by echocardiography within 12 months
  • Stable New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II or greater
  • Heart Failure consultation within the last 18 months
  • Ability to exercise on a cycle ergometer
  • Stable angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) dosage for greater than 3 months

Exclusion Criteria

  • Enrollment in a concurrent study that may confound the results of this study
  • Subjects with medical conditions that would limit study participation
  • Pregnancy
  • Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure less than 110 mmHg
  • Baseline AIx less than 15%
  • Cardiac Surgery with 60 days of potential study enrollment
  • Myocardial infarction within 30 days of potential study enrollment
  • Hemodynamically significant valvular stenosis (greater than mild)
  • Heart failure due to thyroid disease
  • Active myocarditis or anemia defined as hemoglobin less than 9 mg/dl
  • Presence of severe renal insufficiency with serum creatinine greater than 2.5 mg/dl
  • Significant pulmonary hypertension or Cor pumonale
  • Irregular heart rhythms
  • Dyspnea due to pulmonary disease
  • Uninterpretable echocardiographic images or radial tonometry data
  • Significant competing cause for exercise intolerance (e.g., severe stable angina)
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00588692). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search