Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=252 Randomized Treatment

Dopamine Versus Norepinephrine for the Treatment of Vasopressor Dependent Septic Shock

Septic Shock

Enrolled (actual)
252
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Dec 2012
Primary outcome: Primary: Efficacy and Safety of Dopamine Versus Norepinephrine in Septic Shock — 67; 51 participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Dopamine (Drug); Norepinephrine (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Rush University Medical Center
Primary completion
Aug 2009

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Efficacy and Safety of Dopamine Versus Norepinephrine in Septic Shock
67; 51
SECONDARY
Safety, Arrythmia - Yes or no for Each Group
51; 14; 83; 104

Summary

We are performing a prospective, randomized, controlled trial of dopamine versus norepinephrine for septic shock. The trial will enroll patients with suspected or documented site of infection and having 2 out of the three SIRS criteria. Patients will also be receiving standard of care, early-goal directed therapy including but not limited to fluid resuscitation, appropriate and early antibiotics, source control and evaluation for drotrecogin alpha where deemed appropriate, while being supported for septic shock.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients are transferred to our medical intensive care unit from the emergency room (ER), general medical floors, and from outside hospitals.
  • Patients were eligible if they were greater than 18 years of age
  • Presented with a diagnosis of SIRS plus a suspected or documented source of infection.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients were not eligible if they were found to have hypovolemic and/or hemorrhagic etiologies of their vasodilatory shock or another etiology of their SIRS.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00604019). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search