Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=13 Randomized Double-blind

Intranasal CO2 for Allergic Rhinitis

Allergic Rhinitis

Enrolled (actual)
13
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jan 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Change From Diluent Challenge Contralateral Secretion Weight at Antigen Challenge — 6; 19.6 milligrams

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Carbon dioxide, USP (Device); Placebo (Other)
Age
Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of Chicago
Primary completion
Apr 2008

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change From Diluent Challenge Contralateral Secretion Weight at Antigen Challenge
6; 19.6
SECONDARY
Change From Diluent Challenge Ipsilateral Secretion Weight at Antigen Challenge
9; 32.6
SECONDARY
Change From Diluent Challenge Ipsilateral Histamine Level at Antigen Challenge
0; 2.04
SECONDARY
Change From Diluent Challenge Contralateral Histamine Level at Antigen Challenge
0; 0
SECONDARY
Eosinophil Influx [Pre-allergen]
0; 0
SECONDARY
Eosinophil Influx [Post-allergen]
0; 0

Summary

The purpose of this study is to better understand the way in which CO2 (carbon dioxide) affects the symptoms of allergic rhinitis or hayfever. Our intent is to determine if CO2 has an effect on nasal challenge with antigen as a predictor of whether it will have a beneficial effect on the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Males and females between 18 and 45 years of age.
  • History of grass and/or ragweed allergic rhinitis.
  • Positive skin test to grass and/or ragweed antigen.
  • Positive response to screening nasal challenge.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Physical signs or symptoms suggestive of renal, hepatic or cardiovascular disease.
  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Upper respiratory infection within 14 days of study start.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00618410). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search