Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=283

Effectiveness of Hexaminolevulinate (Hexvix) in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Non-invasive Bladder Cancer

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00634621 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
283
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Aug 2014
Primary outcomePrimary: Detecting the Rate of Bladder Cancer Lesions by White-Light Cystoscopy (WLC) and Blue-Light Cystoscopy (BLC) With Hexvix® in the Overall Study Population by Comparison With the Diagnostic Gold Standard, i.e. Histological Examination of Lesions Biopsy. — 41; 1; 31; 30 Number of lesions

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of hexaminolevulinate (Hexvix) in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with non-invasive bladder cancer and if it results in a change in patient management.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Detecting the Rate of Bladder Cancer Lesions by White-Light Cystoscopy (WLC) and Blue-Light Cystoscopy (BLC) With Hexvix® in the Overall Study Population by Comparison With the Diagnostic Gold Standard, i.e. Histological Examination of Lesions Biopsy.
41; 1; 31; 30; 236; 2 —
SECONDARY
Assess the Sensitivity of Standard White Light Cystoscopy (WLC) and Blue Light Cystoscopy (BLC) for Obtaining a Correct Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer at Individual Patient Level.
86.3; 90.9 —

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients over 18 years of age.
  • Patients of either sex.
  • Patients with documented or highly suspected non-invasive bladder cancer.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients with hypersensitivity to the drug substance or any excipient of Hexvix.
  • Patients with porphyry.
  • Women of childbearing age.
  • Patients at a high risk of suffering extensive bladder inflammation e.g. patients after intravesical BCG treatment, patients with moderate or severe leukocyturia or patients undergoing recent bladder surgery.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00634621). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search