Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=9,572 Randomized Screening

HIV Screening in the Emergency Department Setting

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00667186 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
9,572
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jan 2013
Primary outcomePrimary: Percentage of Tested Participants Newly Diagnosed as HIV Infected — 6; 3 percentage of tested that are positive

Summary

Late diagnosis of HIV infection is believed to be responsible for high rates of HIV transmission. The purpose of this study is to determine whether targeted screening versus routine screening will identify a greater number of HIV infected participants. This study will also compare the costs of the resources used for targeted screening versus routine screening.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Tested Participants Newly Diagnosed as HIV Infected
6; 3
SECONDARY
Percentage Consenting to Testing
40.8; 47.4

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adult participants presenting for care in the ED

Exclusion Criteria

  • Participants cognitively unable or unwilling to consent for voluntary HIV counseling and testing
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00667186). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search